User talk:OllieE2b
Welcome!
-- WelcomeBot (talk) 17:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Multiple accounts notice
 | Hello, OllieE2b. You appear to have registered an additional account. Please note that our rules do permit alternate accounts, however you will need to disclose this fact to the administration staff. If this was the result of a glitch/mistake, losing your password to your original account, or if you wanted a different username, please respond below naming the account you wish to keep. The extra account will then be blocked. Additionally, in the event you lost access to your account or wanted a different username, we suggest trying the following actions before creating another account:
|
Reminder regarding edit warring
Hi, OllieE2b. It appears you are engaging in an edit war at Paramount Pictures. This is when users disagree over the content of an article and repeatedly revert each other's edits. This type of editing is disruptive and unproductive. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page before editing further. Thank You. Camenati (talk) 00:37, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- You appear to be edit warring again on the Nick Jr. On Demand article. Considering you have been previously blocked for the same issue, continuing to partake in edit warring will result in a lengthier ban than your previous one. And another note, we have retired tiers such as "Current" due to their subjectivity. Please keep that in mind next time. Camenati (talk) 01:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Regarding the end date of Paramount Pictures' 1986 logo
(reposted from the other account) Hello there! As you can see, we're in a bit of pickle regarding the end date of the 1986 Paramount Pictures logo. I just want to know why you feel the 2003 home media releases of those Nickelodeon releases "count" as the full theatrical logo being kept in active circulation rather than a variant of the 1987 HV logo. (going as far as editing my notes to imply other things while conveniently leaving out context on the 2003 releases' inclusion) The main reason why I feel 2/15/02 is the end date rather than the 10/7/03 date is because we only count the mainline appearances of the theatrical logo (in most contexts), which ended at Crossroads - any further appearances (including the 2003 releases) were one-offs.
Happy to hear your reasoning on why you strongly feel the 2003 releases count as the end date though, and with enough evidence and reasoning, you might convince me to change my mind. And just out of curiosity, I am curious if you read my edit summaries. Solarstrike (talk) 06:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Strong warning regarding edit warring
Hello, OllieE2b. It appears you are continuing to edit war on the Paramount Pictures page by reverting another user's changes yet again. Because you will not cooperate with Solarstrike and continue to disregard administrative warnings on the matter, I am giving you a strong warning on the issue and I strongly implore you to stop edit warring as well as read the site rules and tutorial guide on understanding what is and not desired when making edits on the wiki. You should especially read the logo header section of the latter to understand what types of release dates should be counted when dealing with theatrically released logos, as home video releases of those type of logos not only count but make the lifespan feel inconsistent (the debut date is of a theatrical release whereas the end date is a home media release). If you continue to edit war on the wiki, you will be blocked longer than your previous ban, on top of being indefinitely banned from editing on the Paramount Pictures page, knowing you refuse to cooperate with this particular edit war alongside making plenty of redundant edits on the page (I strongly suggest using the preview button at the end of the source editor for you to determine if you like your changes enough instead of constantly submitting edits). Please be very careful with what edits you make on the wiki, especially on the Paramount Pictures page. Camenati (talk) 17:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- I am warning you again for redundant editing. Repeatedly reverting your own edits can be considered spam and continued spamming will result in a block. Again, please carefully think if you like your edits or not before proceeding, and please use the "Show preview" button in source editor to review them. Camenati (talk) 01:36, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Temporary sitewide block notice
 | You have been blocked for a period of 1 month for persistent or severe violations of AVID's editing policies. Block reason: Continued rule violations, specifically edit warring and spam/redundant editing, in spit of prior administrative warnings. |
As you have been told in the past, repeatedly reverting your edits is considered spam and I suggested thinking carefully about what you want to add to these articles before proceeding. However, because you continue this practice, I have decided to temporarily ban your accounts (you have made three other alternate accounts in the past) for 1 month. I very strongly advise you to review the site rules to grasp what else is allowed and not allowed on the wiki. Please keep this in mind: this is your final temporary ban. You will return to editing on the wiki, but please do not continue to edit war and spam. It will result in an indefinite block if this persists. Tread carefully when you return. Camenati (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2023 (UTC) Camenati (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Final warning regarding rule violations + indefinite partial block notice
Hello, OllieE2b, after seeing you have edit warred on the Paramount Pictures page again, while taking into account your countless warnings regarding the ordeal, I have decided to indefinitely ban you from editing on the page. Because you will still not cooperate with Solarstrike on discussing the 1986 logo's end release date, you are no longer allowed to edit on the page unless you can appeal to me or another admin. And because of that rule violation, you are given a final warning for you to improve your behavior and discontinue the actions that have led to previous warnings and blocks, and I strongly implore you to review our site rules to understand what is or is not allowed on the wiki. You are, as of this writing, still allowed to edit other pages on the wiki, but any significant rule violation will result in your account being indefinitely blocked from editing the wiki. Thank you. Camenati (talk) 20:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Just gonna add my two cents here. The fact that you have not only refused to speak to me nor even said a word to any other editor shows to me that you know exactly what you are doing - and that is total denial and refusal to accept ideas except your own. I was perfectly willing to give you the floor at any point to explain your side of the story - I could've been insulted from you in the rudest way possible and I still would've accepted it, because I know people (likely a young editor like yourself) can just have bad starts to a great editing career and can't communicate or take it too well, but if you opened your mind to others' ideas, anyone can crawl out of bad starts into becoming excellent editors (take for instance, the user Fiddlesticks here). The fact that no one has gotten a word from you or any of your alts shows that you do not care about becoming a good editor - only a troublemaker that will likely see themselves banned in the near future. While I still hold out a small bit of hope that you open up a little bit - I do not see that happening from you, and can't say I blame you at this point. Would love to proven wrong, but at this point - you know what you are doing, and it's hard for me to have sympathy for you when you inevitably run into more trouble. Solarstrike (talk) 06:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
