User talk:Solarstrike

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

An apology.

Hey man. I want to personally apologize to you for blocking you on the WBHE page. I assumed that you removed my edit on there after I added the info on there the second time. It was a significant error on my part and I'm 100% to blame for this situation. Please accept my apology. Stephen C. 15:13, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

No worries, mistakes happen. Solarstrike (talk) 15:48, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Warning

Hi, Solarstrike. I've seen you've made an edit summary on the Walt Disney Pictures. This kind of edit summary is considered uncivil and may instigate conflict, so please be careful on your wording. Thank you Logohub (talk) 03:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Will do. Solarstrike (talk) 03:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Regarding edit summary on Walt Disney Pictures

Hi, please don't post edit summaries that call out or insult other users, even if you are frustrated with a repeated mistake or other undesired edits by others, as it can create drama and other unneeded conflict with other editors. Thank you! HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 03:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Will do. Solarstrike (talk) 03:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your edits on Warner Bros. Pictures

Information icon Hi, Solarstrike. It appears you are engaging in an edit war at Warner Bros. Pictures. This is when users disagree over the content of an article and repeatedly revert each other's edits. This type of editing is disruptive and unproductive. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page before editing further. Thank You. Logohub (talk) 17:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Like last time, I understand. I let my feelings get the best of me again. Solarstrike (talk) 17:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Information icon Please stop repeatedly reverting other people's edits as you have been at Paramount Pictures. Your behavior is considered edit warring and will result in a block if it continues. Camenati (talk) 06:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

About my attitude on RfCs

Where did you fine my "toxic attitude" when I oppose on RfCs? When I vote oppose, I either write something along the lines of "As per above" or "Per "Insert username here", my reason why I'm opposing, or nothing at all. On a couple of RfCs I written "This has to be the worst idea I have ever seen!" or "This is the worst idea I have ever seen on this wiki" which was just my opinion and I have never been nasty to any users on this wiki. So I don't know what you mean about what you said about toxic? This is not intended to start an argument, I'm just confused. (Talk to Me!) 04:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.