User talk:Missisabella
Welcome!
-- WelcomeBot (talk) 20:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Regarding your recent section addition
Hello, Missisabella. Please make sure your newly added sections contain examples next time. Simply stating "Seen on their films from the era" is not specific and is considered section misuse since the point of the Availability section is to state where specifically a logo can be found. Thanks. Camenati (talk) 19:02, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is your second warning on the issue with your creation of Blue Fang Games. Additionally, the "Technique" section is not used to state the moving object, but rather what animation technique is used to animate the logo. Camenati (talk) 15:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Regarding your recent edit
Hi, Missisabella. It appears you are engaging in an edit war at Nick Jr. UK. This is when users disagree over the content of an article and repeatedly revert each other's edits. This type of editing is disruptive and unproductive. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page before editing further. Thank You. On top of that, we do not permit the use of POV terms such as "we see" as that takes away the neutrality and formality of the page. Because you appear to be violating various rules on the wiki, I suggest re-reading the site rules and tutorial guide so that you do not receive further warnings regarding your behavior. Camenati (talk) 21:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Warning regarding editing guidelines
Hello, Missisabella. It appears you are continuing to violate editing guidelines by not including examples in your recent page creation, despite being warned a few times regarding this issue. In case you have missed your previous warnings, simply stating "Seen on their releases" is a form of section misuse that misses the point of the Availability section. Please note that readers would like to know what specific releases contain the logo and without them, the section is pointless and provides no viable information of the logo's sources. Re-reading the tutorial guide to understand how to properly under these sections will help you improve your edits and avoid further warnings and bans. If you think there needs to be further improvements to the page, create the article in draftspace until it's ready for mainspace.
I must warn you that another, lengthier ban is possible if you continue to misuse sections, among other rule violations, next time. Camenati (talk) 06:59, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- You have been warned again after your section addition to Flying Bark Productions. There is the "{{AvailabilityExamples}}" template if you are unsure where the logo can be found, but putting effort into researching where the logo can be found, especially if it's a newer logo, is desired in this case. Another temporary ban isn't out of the question if you continue to misuse the Availability section. Camenati (talk) 20:31, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- You have been warned again for use of POV terms, specifically "we", in your recent page creation. Continued editing guidelines violations will make another ban possible. Camenati (talk) 22:08, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Notification of temporary sitewide block
Hello, Missisabella. After seeing you continue to misuse the Availability section by not including examples in your recent page creation, I have decided to temporarily block your account from editing the wiki. As you have been told in the past, simply stating "Seen on their releases" is a form of section misuse that misses the point of the Availability section, which is to tell readers what specific release contain the logo. I apologize for not reminding you of the "{{AvailabilityExamples}}" template for sections with no examples, in case you do not know where the logo can be found. However, there are times when a user finds a logo off its original source instead of an unsourced personal upload where one might expect them to know what releases contain the logo. If you fall within that category, then at least be helpful towards other editors who want to add examples to your page creations.
Additionally, please do not duplicate draft articles in mainspace, particularly if it still has uncorrected issues. That indicates a refusal for improvements in the quality of these pages and instead a desire for it to be presented to the general reader regardless if it breaks mainspace-related rules such as incomplete descriptions, section misuse, etc. If you disagree with the moving of an article to draftspace, please discuss it with the user who performed said action instead of duplicating it in mainspace.
Knowing this is your second ban, I highly suggest re-reading the site rules and the tutorial guide to understand what is and not allowed when creating pages, documenting new logos, etc. Until them, take some time to read these guides and relax before your return to the wiki. Camenati (talk) 21:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- You have been blocked again for similar reasons as above. The Availability section is a required section in animation logos, so it should not be left out in that case. Additionally, please be more specific with the animation technique used to produce the logo than just stating "animation". There is still plenty of work to improve your knowledge of how these sections work, so I strongly suggest re-reading the tutorial guide closely to understand what should and should not be included when publishing articles for the wiki. If you want to be safe with your page creations, then I recommend creating them in draftspace so that someone can review them and show what aspects you need improvement in so that you do not end up with a future warning or ban. Creating them in mainspace means presenting product to a general public, which will create an uneven quality of articles for the wiki. Thank you for your understanding. Camenati (talk) 20:51, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Strong warning regarding editing guidelines
Hello, Missisabella. After seeing you continue to exclude examples from your newly added section, I have decided to give you a strong warning regarding various editing guidelines since you have broken the examples requirement multiple times. To paraphrase from one of your previous warnings, "simply stating "Seen on their releases" is a form of section misuse that misses the point of the Availability section. Please note that readers would like to know what specific releases contain the logo and without them, the section is pointless and provides no viable information of the logo's sources". Also, you appear to be unaware about the {{AvailabilityExamples}} template you add to the end of sections if you are unsure where the logo can be found. Without it, it leaves readers expecting to hear where specifically the logo can be found only to be met with just a blunt, obvious statement. Please remember that it is important to provide supporting evidence in your research so that readers are aware of the legitimacy of your information.
Additionally, stating there is no Technique used for the logo (in this case, Technique: None.) is now considered misuse as that implies logos are made out of thin air. You may want to use other techniques that describe a still logo such as a digital or computerized graphic, a cel sheet, etc.
If you continue to misuse sections, you may be blocked for a longer period of time, which will eventually lead to an indefinite block if this persists. I very strongly urge you to read the tutorial guide closely to thoroughly understand these sections better and what to include and avoid when adding new sections/pages to the wiki. Thank you for your understanding. Camenati (talk) 22:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Final warning regarding editing guidelines
Hello Missisabelle. In spite of multiple, previous warnings reminding you about various editing guidelines on the wiki, it seems you are continuing to persist in disregarding guidelines you are having issues with when inserting new pages or sections into the wiki, particularly the lack of examples in the sections you've been adding. Please take the reason why examples are permitted on the Availability section seriously in case you have missed: a simple statement like "Seen on their releases" is insufficient and does not reflect the purpose of the Availability section. Readers expect specific information about where the logo can be found, and with no examples provided, the section would be meaningless because such a statement is just stating the obvious. You have the {{AvailabilityExamples}} template if you are unsure where the logo can be found. Without it, the section is left with no credibility and frustrate readers expecting any extra information to follow.
In addition to this, you have also been warned for stating there is no Technique used for the logo (specifically "Technique: None.). Again, that is now considered misuse as it suggests logos are created without any method. Describing if the logo is digital, computerized, cel sheet, etc. is a sufficient replacement now that type of Technique is no longer permitted.
Continuing to misuse any editing guideline will result in an indefinite block, considering you have violated many rules regarding editing guidelines in the past and failing to thoroughly examine the tutorial guide to understand what is desired and undesired when adding sections or creating pages. This is your final plea to read the tutorial guide and avoid violating editing guidelines in the future. Please take this warning into consideration, especially when documenting new logos on the wiki. Camenati (talk) 16:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite sitewide block notice
 | You have been blocked indefinitely for persistent or severe violations of AVID's editing policies. Block reason: Continued violations of various editing guidelines in spite of multiple administrative warnings. (see: block log · contributions) |
Hello, Missisabella. Unfortunately, in spite of your previous warning regarding technique misuse, alongside various other editing guidelines, it appears you are continuing to misuse those sections with your recent section addition by again using the now invalid term "Technique: None". Taking into account all of your previous bans and warnings on the wiki, you are now indefinitely blocked from editing. If you wish to appeal your block, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand what is expected when appealing a ban. Please try to focus on improving your behavior in the next few months or so instead of filing an appeal immediately so that you can demonstrate you acknowledge the rules you have violated and can add new sections that are in line with editing guidelines. If you have shown genuine improvement within that timeframe, then that brings up a good chance of your account being unbanned. Best of luck in your future appeal. Camenati (talk) 15:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
