AVID:Requests for Comment/Article rename template
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- Closing as failed per author request. (Lets chat!) 08:36, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Article rename template
A template suggesting an article be moved to a new name. This should be used if the subject of a page got renamed recently or if the pagename is not the company's actual name ForcedExcess26 (talk) 12:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose If anyone can do it, then you don't need a template lol. (What you gonna do when clip-ons come for you!?) 11:56, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. This isn't necessary, such info can be found in the background section. (Lets chat!) 14:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- edited the summery to make goal clearer. ForcedExcess26 (talk) 17:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- I still oppose, as anyone with an account can just move the page. with this in mind, such a template would still be completely unnecessary. (Lets chat!) 04:45, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- edited the summery to make goal clearer. ForcedExcess26 (talk) 17:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. While I understand the reason behind the template, I think it would be more effective if Users just went ahead and moved the page to the new/correct name. This should work perfectly fine as site staff can easily stop or revert any vandal/false page renames. Luke2505 (talk) 20:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. · Talk · Edits 09:57, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose That's not necessary since anyone can move a page. For that reason, I'm out. AUnnamedDragon 8:30 AM, May 19, 2023 (CET; time of page saving)
- Oppose There really is not a reason to do this, any user that is not blocked and has at least 3 brain cells can do this. -- Cheers, Justin Aves (talk • contribs • global • rights) 19:09, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Comments
- I think it's very clear that this proposal failed, so if anyone wants to request SNOW closure, feel free to do so. AUnnamedDragon 8:17 PM, May 22, 2023 (CET)
- That's not how SNOW closure works. It needs at least 10 votes for it to be considered for SNOW. The only way for it to be wrapped up early is if ForcedExcess retracts the proposal at the moment. (Lets chat!) 07:27, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- which i would like to ForcedExcess26 (talk) 07:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.