User talk:Beatrizburle

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Welcome!




Welcome to the Audiovisual Identity Database (AVID), Beatrizburle!

Let's get started, shall we?



The dos and don'ts of the site. Please follow them.


Learn the proper formatting guidelines for writing articles.


Meet the Site Staff, including Mods, Admins and Crats.


Write articles on these undocumented audiovisual identities to help the site out.


Answering some of the most commonly asked questions about AVID.


Happy editing! -




-- WelcomeBot (talk) 21:18, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Regarding your recent edits to Spin Master Entertainment

Hello, Beatrizburle and thank you for your contributions to the wiki. It appears you are adding a prediction to to said page by stating the 2023 logo will appear on a fictious movie (The Little Charmers Movie, to be specific). Please note these two things:

  1. We do not allow predictions in the wiki as there is a possibility they can be incorrect if it turns out to not be the case, resulting in the wiki spreading false information.
  2. Fictious information is not permitted in mainspace or draftspace articles, as the aim of the wiki is to be an accurate database on the information of various identities. If you want to present your fictious additions to the wiki, you may do so on your associated userpages such as your sandbox.

Thank you for your understanding of these specific rules. Camenati (talk) 04:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Regarding your legacy section edits to Living Dead Guy Productions

Hello, Beatrizburle. The Legacy section is not a place to state opinions based on one's sole judgement. We want to avoid inserting POV into articles as the whole point of them is to be informative. not a blog someone writes giving their own perspective and opinions regarding a subject. In that regard, the opinionated Legacy sections stick out from the rest of the factual-driven article and should be avoided for a consistent and formal tone. Thank you for your understanding. Camenati (talk) 22:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Warning regarding technique misuse

Hello, Beatrizburle. There are two things to note regarding the Technique section:

  1. Stating "None" for the technique is considered misuse, as we now considered that as creating logos out of thin air. Instead, describe the animation style or technique used in still logos by stating they are "a still, digital graphic" or "a image traditionally painted on a card", etc.
  2. We do not state the moving objects in the technique section. Again, the section is to describe what animation technique is used to animate or design the logo. In that context, stating the logo was animated with a shape or beam does not make sense.

Considering you have received several warnings regarding editing guidelines, you may be temporarily blocked from editing the wiki and will be strongly encouraged to re-read the tutorial guide if you break another, or the same, editing guideline. Thank you for your understanding. Camenati (talk) 02:28, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Harpo Studios

Hello, Beatrizburle. Please understand that making a large amount of minor edits on an article can be considered spam and can also prevent other users from editing the article. Save your edits if you think you have made all the changes you wanted to make on the article instead of changing, removing, or adding a word or two every time you submit an edit on the page. You may also use the provided "Show preview" and "Show changes" buttons to review the changes you have made and if you think they structurally work well. Thank you for your understanding. Camenati (talk) 22:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Considering you are continuing to make a large amount of minor edits on an article, you could be blocked from the specific article temporarily if you continue to submit minor edits repeatedly. Camenati (talk) 22:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
You have been warned again after making a large sum of unexplained, minor edits on Satin City, some of which are redundant. Since you have been repeating this behavior on other pages, a temporary sitewide block would not be out of the question and you could end up dealing with that again. Again, please ensure you are satisfied with all the changes you have made to the article instead of repeatedly changing small portions of an article without explanation. Camenati (talk) 21:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Regarding mainspace

Hello, Beatrizburle. Although it was your intention to expand your newly created blank mainspace articles, please submit articles that are meant for gradual completion in draftspace, as mainspace is intended for the submission of completed articles, not those that are currently under construction. On top of that, now that you are creating mainspace articles recently, you have to take editing guidelines more seriously, which include:

  1. Avoid misusing the MIA template especially if there is a video available on the internet or even on the wiki.
  2. Fill in the Credits template and provide categories for the article. They can be considered violations of the AVID:BLANK policy.
  3. Avoid subjectively describing the logo's technique such as labelling it as "simple" or "complex".

To be safe, as said before, it is recommended you create these articles in draftspace to understand what is and not allowed when writing articles and what are the requirements to getting your articles approved for mainspace. Please be sure to keep the above notes in mind next time. Thank you. Camenati (talk) 16:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

This is your second warning on submitting incomplete mainspace articles with your recent page creation.
On top of that, please do not submit drafts while making no changes, as constantly doing this will not get the drafts moved to mainspace. Doing nothing will not work to your advantage whatsoever and they will continue to be declined until you either fix them or address them to the user who declined your draft. It also makes the creator of these drafts look like they are not willing to learn what is and not allowed in mainspace or take criticism.
Continued editing guideline violations, including draftspace violations, will result in a lengthier temporary ban than your previous one. Camenati (talk) 18:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Strong warning regarding rule violations

Hello, Beatrizburle. After seeing you have created not only another incomplete page in mainspace, on top of documenting a fictitious logo and YouTuber who does not meet notability guidelines, I am giving you a strong warning and imploration to re-reading the site rules to understand what is allowed and not allowed when editing on the wiki. As you have been told in the past:

  1. Incomplete sections in mainspace will bring direct exposure to laziness in front of the general reader. Readers do not want to be disappointed with unfinished information, hoping to understand a certain element heard or seen in the logo.
  2. Fictitious logos are not allowed to be documented in mainspace or draftspace in order to maintain the wiki's reliability and accuracy for logo-related information. Otherwise, the site will lose credibility among several readers who visit the wiki to learn about real audiovisual identities. Pages documenting these kinds of logos should be relegated to your associated userpages.
  3. The logo comes from a YouTuber who does not meet notability guidelines. Smaller YouTubers should not have pages for their logos yet, as that gives off the feeling everyone deserves a page on the wiki in spite of having little to no recognition.

Another rule violation may result in another, lengthier sitewide ban, and continued violations will eventually result in an indefinite ban. After seeing you have taken a break from editing for several weeks, I hope you have understood better, considering you appear to listened to some of the rules and feedback reminded upon you in the past. Camenati (talk) 23:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.