Forum:Reminder: do not place television idents under the "television logos" category: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Administrators' Board}} {{Forumpost |text=I still see some idents being placed under the "television logos" category. I ask you not to do this because television logos and idents are different and serve a different purpose. Thanks for the attention. |username=Logoarto |rank={{subst:#ifingroup:bureaucrat|Bureaucrat| }}{{subst:#ifingroup:sysop|{{subst:#ifingroup:bureaucrat| |Administrator}}| }} {{subst:#ifingroup:moderator|Moderator}} |timestamp={{subst:CURRE...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forumheader|Administrators' Board}}
{{Forumheader|Administrators' Board}}
{{FeaturedThread}}
{{Forumpost
{{Forumpost
|text=I still see some idents being placed under the "television logos" category. I ask you not to do this because television logos and idents are different and serve a different purpose. Thanks for the attention.
|text=I still see some idents being placed under the "television logos" category. I ask you not to do this because television logos and idents are different and serve a different purpose. Thanks for the attention.

Latest revision as of 16:58, 20 April 2024

This thread has been featured.


avatar
Logoarto
Bureaucrat
20 April 2024

Reply or edit
Report post



I still see some idents being placed under the "television logos" category. I ask you not to do this because television logos and idents are different and serve a different purpose. Thanks for the attention.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.