Forum:Can we discontinue usage of "Don't expect this to appear" on the availability section?
| Report post
|
I mean, I only suggest it because it appears on so many articles and it's just the same reasons why ("despite the company being involved"). |
| Report post
|
I'm for this, such a needless and informal phrase. Need to focus on where the logo can be seen, not where it can't. |
| Report post
|
The pages should see more variety in wording than just "Don't expect this to appear" or "Despite the company being involved", but receiving the boot like "Seen on releases by the company" just because it appears too much makes no sense. If that is the case, then we should stop using terms like "On a black background, we see a". Also, this phrase is still relevant to the logo's availability by describing what pieces of media don't use this logo. If that is taken out, and one release did not contain this logo, then readers will feel like something's missing, maybe even see the section as containing false information if it starts with a phrase like "Seen on releases by the company", but the logo actually doesn't appear on all of them within that time frame. Let the article maintain its honesty. |
| Report post
|
There is no need to discontinue the "Don't expect this to appear" part on the availability section! |
| Report post
|
You mean "there is no NEED" to discontinue it? |
| Report post
|
We need to include this in availability sections. Because some films and shows don't have the involvement of the companies that people are expecting. |
