Replying to Forum:Can we discontinue usage of "Don't expect this to appear" on the availability section?

Sorry, you are unable to edit this page.

You must log in first to perform this action.

Click the "Reply" button below (above the summary bar) to add a new post.
Do not edit or delete other people's posts without permission. Disruptive edits to other users' posts will be reverted immediately and the user responsible may be blocked.

Insert text below: I mean, I only suggest it because it appears on so many articles and it's just the same reasons why ("despite the company being involved").

Posted by:

Insert text below: I'm for this, such a needless and informal phrase. Need to focus on where the logo can be seen, not where it can't.

Posted by:

Insert text below: The pages should see more variety in wording than just "Don't expect this to appear" or "Despite the company being involved", but receiving the boot like "Seen on releases by the company" just because it appears too much makes no sense. If that is the case, then we should stop using terms like "On a black background, we see a". Also, this phrase is still relevant to the logo's availability by describing what pieces of media don't use this logo. If that is taken out, and one release did not contain this logo, then readers will feel like something's missing, maybe even see the section as containing false information if it starts with a phrase like "Seen on releases by the company", but the logo actually doesn't appear on all of them within that time frame. Let the article maintain its honesty.

Posted by:

Insert text below: There is no need to discontinue the "Don't expect this to appear" part on the availability section!

Posted by:

Insert text below: You mean "there is no NEED" to discontinue it?

Posted by:

Insert text below: We need to include this in availability sections. Because some films and shows don't have the involvement of the companies that people are expecting.

Posted by:

Tools: {{quote|}}

This is a minor edit

Watch this page