User:Ashley Taylor

Can I ask why you are creating the voice over categories right now even though that proposal has not opened yet?

Excuse me, which of a Nelvana show and/or a video game uses the 2001 Nelvana logo that last seen on February 3, 2006?

Maybe it's just me, but regarding categorizing every instance of a company being founded by a singular person as a "vanity card", I think you are treating the definition of that term too ambiguously. What some vanity cards, such as Bee Caves Road and And Then... have in common is that they appear to solely represent one person or a few amount of people as opposed to companies like Balboa Productions that actually consist of more than a group of people operating the business. At that point, that is like categorizing the Edison Manufacturing Company page as a vanity card in the same league as Electric Avenue.

Yeah, the category needs to be clearer in its purpose because otherwise, every single British television logo would fall in that category thanks to the category's description being too ambiguous.

I don't think the "Logos that vary depending on the source" category applies to every page that mostly appears through variants, especially in-credit logos. It doesn't make a lot of sense that the entire screen would count as source varying when the logo is basically the same (such as Wark Clements).

You tried to double-support an RfC specifically because one user opposed. That's frowned upon.

Please don't attempt to manipulate RFC votes just because one person voted the other way.