Forum:Why are you guys viewing the Technique of completely still logos as "misuse"?
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
| Report post
|
On pages for completely still logos, particularly vanity cards, the proper technique description for these pages ("none") is being seen as "possible misuse", and therefore a violation of rules. I have pages made whose drafts I can't submit because of this. What's going on here? |
| Report post
|
That is part of a new rule on usage of the "Technique" section per a passed RfC. |
| Report post
|
I would do this: In-Credit mentions of a company are NOT logos if it's just text that's part of the credits, same font and all. If there is an artistic design in-credit, it IS an in-credit logo. Still logos are logos as long as they have some artistic merit to them. |
