Forum:Why are you guys viewing the Technique of completely still logos as "misuse"?: Revision history

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

4 February 2024

23 January 2024

  • curprev 15:1615:16, 23 January 2024JMFabiano talk contribs 1,007 bytes +190 No edit summary
  • curprev 07:3507:35, 23 January 2024AUnnamedDragon talk contribs 817 bytes +388 No edit summary
  • curprev 06:2306:23, 23 January 2024Sanicspeed3 talk contribs 429 bytes +429 Created page with "{{Forumheader|Administrators' Board}} {{Forumpost |text=On pages for completely still logos, particularly vanity cards, the proper technique description for these pages ("none") is being seen as "possible misuse", and therefore a violation of rules. I have pages made whose drafts I can't submit because of this. What's going on here? |username=Sanicspeed3 |rank={{subst:#ifingroup:bureaucrat|Bureaucrat| }}{{subst:#ifingroup:sysop|{{subst:#ifingroup:bureaucrat| |Administrat..."
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.