AVID:Requests for Comment/Ban RfC votes with no writing

Ban RfC votes with no writing
Should we ban RfC votes that look like this?

(Talk to Me!) 15:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

(Talk to Me!) 15:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

(Talk to Me!) 15:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

The reason why I would like to see RfC votes banned like the examples above is that they are just a waste of time and voters should give their reason for voting.

If this passes the following punishment for breaking my proposed rule should be:


 * 1st offence: A warning
 * 2nd offence: A second (and final) warning
 * 3rd offence: A one-day ban
 * 4th offence: A one-week ban

So is my new proposed RfC voting rule a good idea? (Talk to Me!) 15:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * While some reasoning for a vote would be helpful, sometimes people may not be able to describe their exact reason or the reasons that they have for voting have been said by everyone else. Imo I don't think we should force people to give reasonings for their votes if they don't want to. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 16:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Cattotld (talk) 16:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Per Hibiscus. (not gonna lie I found Cattot's opposal pretty funny, as it is literally ironizing this RfC even more) VPJHuk (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I apologize for what I'm about to because it's against the spirit of what this RfC is proposing, but I shall not let an opportunity go wasted as it was my vote anyway, so here goes:
 * Compooper (talk) 16:37, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * banning people because they don't know how to voice their opinions is too much.  Logohub   (talk) 16:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * This is fine the way it is. IAmThe789Guy (talk)
 * Sometimes there isn't anything that a user would like to add because it has already been said by another user. Luke2505 (talk) 17:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)