AVID:Requests for Comment/Negatively-recieved logos section

How to find hated logos
So, there are some logos around who have been hated for its animation, simplicity, music, cheesiness, omnipresence, a hated rebrand etc. I'm thinking we should make a category that features companies with logos with a ton of haters. That way, we can spite the creation of the logo easier.

Support

 * 1)  NLiteChannel.jpg (The Third Place) 16:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) This seems more like opinion, but doesn't this harken back to the CLG wiki days? IAmThe789Guy (talk) 15:06, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) I don't love the idea. Opens the door to biased opinions and all that. For that reason I'm out. Compooper (talk) 16:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) As said by Compooper, would likely see biased opinions being inserted on a regular basis. Plus, technically the Legacy section is able to mention if there's a general consensus within the logo community that certain logos are bad, so I personally feel this proposal is kinda moot because of that. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 16:51, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * No, just no. The Legacy section is just fitting, per Hibiscus. Doctorine Dark (talk) 16:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) per everyone else. We got rid of Cheesy Factors and Scare Factors for being too opinionated. This idea is no less opinionated. T807sig.png · Talk · Edits 20:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments
Since everyone is against this, I'm requesting speedy closure.
 * This might be a good idea for a series on the AVID Channel, where OP can talk about Negatively Received logos. Luke2505 (talk) 12:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)