AVID:Requests for Comment/Add "(tentative)" for logos yet to debut

Add "(tentative)" for logos yet to debut
So yeah, I have seen that Logopedia puts "(tentative)" for logos that are yet to make their official debut; see example here. Well I was planning this should also be done on AVID. How does that sound?

PS: For examples, you can look at my sandbox here.

11:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Can do, I guess. Gilby1385 (talk) 18:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) I think we should aim to not be too similar to Logopedia personally. Some implementations, such as ImageTOC and Chronology have proven useful, but I fear that pushing for further similarities would lead to a bad reputation for us amongst LP users. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (Lets chat!) 11:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Good point. Gilby1385 (talk) 20:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) per EMG. T807sig.png · Talk · Edits 23:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Same. MJ2003 (talk) 23:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Per everyone ForcedExcess26 (talk) 23:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) I'm going to be perfectly real here, how would we even implement this? If a logo debuts on-screen, the date of when that happens should be the first release date for the logo, we shouldn't need a "tentative". This would really only work for print logos on Logopedia and I feel like this won't translate well into AVID's focus of animated, on-screen logos. Compooper (talk) 23:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * precisely. This would only work in fringe cases where the logo is revealed before its first usage (Disney100, for example). We shouldn't implement something that would be used on 1 in every 500 pages at best. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (Lets chat!) 01:58, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 2. 312rGA.gify Cervhiche (talk) 18:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC)