AVID:Requests for Comment/Have Captions for All Images

I have been noticing thaton some pages, some captions are missing for some images. An image without a caption does not tell what the version of the logo is. By having a caption for every image, it improves the article further and tells what the version of the logo looks like. This does not apply to logos that have just one variant, or is a one-off logo. (Updated February 3, 2023 at 07:37 AM EST) ∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞ (꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂) | (꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂) 14:57, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Support
for logos with more than one specific variant. It sure will be handy. On the other hand… Doctorine Dark (talk) 16:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

(The Third Place) 14:15, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Abstain
Both sides are making good points. Gilby1385 (talk) 14:52, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Oppose
for doing it on all images. I don’t think it’s necessary to caption one logo variant. Something like “Original variant” as a caption for one capture seems redundant. Doctorine Dark (talk) 16:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The goal was to have captions on all images (except for logos that have just one variant). ∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞ (꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂) | (꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂) 16:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * In that case I prefer to put “standard” instead of “original variant”. Luli Logo (talk) 00:35, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

per Doctorine.  Logohub   (talk) 16:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

. Captions aren't necessary for every single image, especially if a logo has no variants. Dominicmgm (talk) 13:55, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

No ForcedExcess26 (talk) 22:23, 2 February 2023 (UTC)