AVID:Requests for Permissions

Oppose

 * {{Oppose}] After your recent actions on Discord, I do not think you possess the correct level of maturity required for moderator. Luke2505 (talk) 18:09, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) for all your major contributions recently. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (Lets chat!) 12:57, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) This user is very active over on our Discord and has shown a lot of improvement over the last few months. Definitely has my support. Luke2505 (talk) 12:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) Very surprised you aren't a Moderator yet. You have my full support. Compooper (talk) 12:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Luke2505. Cattotld (talk) 12:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 4) per Luke.   Logohub   (talk) 12:39, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Absolutely! You've proven yourself as a valuable part of the staff team in the Discord, and I can't wait to see what you bring to the wiki. Compooper (talk) 12:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) per Compooper. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (Lets chat!) 12:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) {{Support}} has been a great help to the community.  Logohub   (talk) 12:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) as your reasoning is solely relying on the Parkee incident. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (Lets chat!) 13:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) per EMG.   Logohub   (talk) 13:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * You didn't provide any reasoning as to why you should be a mod. Also, after re-reading it while giving my honest opinion, I can safely say I did not understand what you're trying to get at here. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 16:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Support
User does a lot of work cleaning up articles. Although you have been subject to some warnings, and the attitude is, well, something, I do think you have a shot at becoming admin, one way or another. Doctorine Dark (talk) 08:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

I'd like to see you become an admin! I think you have the responsibility and courage to have the second biggest role on this wiki! (Talk to Me!) 19:55, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Support
This user has shown that they know their stuff and they also meet the requirements so I definitely see this user helping the team out. (• USER TALK! •) 14:15, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) User edits in good faith, seems knowledgeable enough in CSS coding and is also very active on the wiki.   Logohub   (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) Meets all requirements for adminship, reasoning per Logohub. Has been a major help on the wiki. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 18:40, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) thought you were an admin already lmao. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (name change coming soon) 03:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) to be honest, same. Compooper (talk) 03:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) Lol I also thought you were already an admin. This user is fit for the admin team. Charlie fiddlesticks signature.png (• USER TALK! •) 03:28, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 4) Doctorine Dark (talk) 07:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 5)  Very active on the wiki, edits in good faith and have often reported bad-faith users.   Logohub   (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Support
Doctorine Dark (talk) 16:06, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) He has been inactive for sometime now.   Logohub   (talk) 09:37, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I will this, but not without giving my thanks to you for your duties as admin over the past 8 years. I wish you the best in your future endeavors. Compooper (talk) 11:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


 * 1) It goes without saying I must thank Cooley for his years of service, he has been an admin for as long as I can remember. While the recent revelations are disappointing I wish Cooley all the best going forward. Luke2505 (talk) 11:55, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


 * 1) C̴̣̳̟͇̳͓̀̆̿Ā̸̛̛̝͎̗̲̯̲̰͠M̷̢̯̗̱͎̗̰̈̌̎͜E̶͖̪̽̓͒N̵̗̘̩͇̫̭̤̙̈́̑͜A̸̼̫̯̮̼̟̲̫̲̍̈́̐͑̑̓̎̀̎̍̀͜T̵̡̨̧̪̼͓̜͉͇͎́I̵̧͍̥̗͕͐ͅ 18:18, 6 February 2023 (UTC)