AVID:Requests for Comment/Have Different Fonts Implemented on AVID

Using the Correct Fonts for logo text
Over on the Discord server, Doctorine Dark proposed we start implementing different fonts on the wiki, using the correct ones for text that appears in a logo. For expample, Minion Black being used across the DreamWorks pages, or, in the image accompanying this, Gotham.



What are your thoughts? (Lets chat!) 11:57, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Definitely seeing this as an opportunity to better describe logos visually. Though I don't think we should put a font on the entire body content of the page. Just the bits that have distinguished fonts. Either way, I'm in. Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:06, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) Compooper (talk) 12:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) per Doctorine Dark. T807sig.png · Talk · Edits 18:26, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 4) NLiteChannel.jpg (The Third Place) 19:56, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 5) Per everyone else. Luke2505 (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 6) per everyone else.   Logohub   (talk) 15:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 7) As per everybody above! Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg   (Talk to Me!) 16:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Oppose
why the ████ is everyone liking this idea? if the logo has a bad looking font then that means that the entire page would look really bad. an example would be the aforementioned dreamworks. don't get me wrong- minion is a good looking font. but really only for logos or titles. for small text on say for example a book or a wiki page on the other hand, it really wouldn't look that good. God forbid a logo uses a goofy ahh display font. also, it would really takr a long time for the fonts EVERY page to be done, whch in itself is a whole other can of worms. also it would defeat the entire purpose of the avid sans font to begin withdiberhaze (talk) 13:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)