AVID:Requests for Comment/Scary Logos Section

Should we add a new section with information about scary logos like the Screen Gems "S from Hell" and the Viacom "V of Doom" etc? Sickminecraft45 (talk) 15:51, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Please close this! This was an experiment that was a bad idea and it got me on the User Reports page claiming me to be 'underage' when I'm 15! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 14:32, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1)  This is what we've been trying to move away from. As AVID has evolved, we've moved away from the concept of 'scary logos', as such a concept is far too subjective, hence why we removed the Scare Factor in 2018. Such a section/category would be a step backwards at this stage. MinistrycraftEntertainment-EternityEntertainmentsignature.jpg (name change coming soon) 17:27, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 2)  This is just the Scare Factor all over again lmao CalvinWilkerson-transformed.png(The Third Place) 18:48, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 3)  Per all the above votes. One of the reasons why the scare and cheesy factors were discontinued is because their very subjective and would give out opinions others may disagree with. Editor's Notes replaced them, but even then their still subjective which got them replaced with Legacy sections, sections that talk about what is notable in the logo and not opinions. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 20:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 4)  Like what others have said, the community has already got rid of the Scare Factors that was abolished in 2018 in favor of Editor's Note, and recently the Legacy. PokeRapMonster (talk) 10:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 5) This is pointless, per above. I don't see a point in doing this. --Blad  (talk • contribs • global)  14:48, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 6) Symbol full oppose vote.svg Absolutely. Not. Strongly Oppose. Compooper 15:52, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 7)  No. We have moved away from "scary logos" for the most part because of what other users here have brought up along with the fact that it was making the wiki look like a laughingstock with how overexaggerated, childish and all-around terribly written the Scare Factors usually were. If you want to talk about scary logos, I suggest doing so either on a user page, AVID:What's the scariest logo you've ever seen? or the unaffiliated Scary Logos Wiki on Fandom. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 16:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Though given how its an opinionated wiki and Qualitipedia was shutdown for destroying the reception of Miraheze, its unluckily that the Scary Logos Wiki would live longer. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 20:34, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * This would trigger a reception wiki disaster. Please don't JrStudios (talk) 23:24, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1)  Per everyone else. T807sig.png · Talk · Edits 21:08, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 2)  Literally this wiki would turn into another cringe scary logos wiki --CD967119 (talk) 22:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 3)  Hey kid, Weenie Hut Jr.'s is down the street. puz_need_this_for_my_signature.png 00:31, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 4)  This is the stupidest crap I've ever seen. Poociansignature.png (My Talk Page) 17:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 5)  Logos are stupid --Zdrmonster (talk) 23:21, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Why are you here then? Poociansignature.png (My Talk Page) 13:53, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey, don't judge the man. If he says logos are stupid, logos are stupid. Charlie fiddlesticks signature.png (lets talks) 14:03, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1)  What in the world is the reason for continuing to mention scary logos anymore? It's a thing of the past. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 23:57, 21 November 2022 (UTC) IAmThe789Guy
 * 2)  Now I hate to Strongest Oppose something but this would just be straight-up redundant and meaningless Charlie fiddlesticks signature.png (lets talks) 14:05, 22 November 2022 (UTC)