Replying to Forum:"Surprising appears" being removed, but why?

Sorry, you are unable to edit this page.

You must log in first to perform this action.

Click the "Reply" button below (above the summary bar) to add a new post.
Do not edit or delete other people's posts without permission. Disruptive edits to other users' posts will be reverted immediately and the user responsible may be blocked.

Insert text below: Recently I saw that Camenati (the wiki bureaucrat) has removed the "Surprising appears" on all pages, but why? Because there was no RfC talking about this. Did I happen to miss something? If this was because of someone saying this to remove on discord, the answer is I can't know (because i am banned there).

Posted by:

Insert text below: It was a subjective phrase that is POV. Not everyone would agree that if a logo appeared on a piece of media well after it was retired would be surprising. Some might expect it to be there because the piece of media was produced before the company debuted a new logo. It is also not clear sometimes why a logo's appearance on that media is surprising. For instance, [[Suchanda Chalachitra\|this page]] used to carry that phrase, but again, it's not clear what makes the latter film carrying their (currently only) logo surprising.

Posted by:

Insert text below: Oh, I understand why

Posted by:

Tools: {{quote|}}

This is a minor edit

Watch this page