Forum:An idea regarding the NSFW template

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Revision as of 02:12, 21 July 2022 by AlmightyKingPrawn (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Reply or edit
Report post



I feel that putting royally screwed-up logos like No Limits Fun under the same template as, say, Kitty Media, seems a little unfair in my eyes.

This is why I'm proposing an NSFL (Not Safe for Life) template for use on the higher-level stuff, like child pornography/extreme violence/sexual content (such as the aforementioned No Limits Fun and any similar future logos) or racism (such as Minstrel Entertainments).


Reply or edit
Report post



Yeah, No Limits Fun is now gone. That shouldn't be on here, especially given we have many minors both viewing and editing.


Reply or edit
Report post



As the person who added the stronger NSFW warning to the No Limits Fun page prior to its deletion, I agree that we should maybe never have a page about child traffickers ever again. I'm also the person who added the NSFW marker to Minstrel Entertainments, and I feel it suffices.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.