AVID:Requests for Comment/Summarization section
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
You know how people usually just misuse the FX/SFX section to just summarize what happened in the logo? Like "FX/SFX: The logo unfolding, The text drawing in."? Well, i was thinking, what if we added a "Summarization:" section that was essentially what everyone misuses the FX/SFX section for, and keep the FX/SFX section, but make it explicitly clear how to actually use it. What do you think?
Support
Support I agree with that. 
· Talk · Edits 04:24, 26 November 2022 (UTC)- Support I'm with Trevor on this one
(The Third Place) 06:28, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Abstain
Abstain I don't quite get what this would do for the sections. 
(• USER TALK! •) 16:34, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose What you've described is what the "Logo" and "Sounds" sections are for, at least according to this [[1]]. You make a very good point about its misuse, but personally I think the FX/SFX section is a bit redundant and should be removed completely. The people who made the logo/composed the music can be included in the "Trivia" section and whether or not its scanimate/CGI/stop-motion could be added to the "Logo" section, perhaps as the last sentence in the section after the description. Luke2505 (talk) 16:24, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- The funny thing is, the TAT logo section literally describes scanimation. (• USER TALK! •) 16:35, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- The funny thing is, the TAT logo section literally describes scanimation.
