AVID:Requests for Comment/Should we categorize In-credit logo variations as logo variants?

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Revision as of 18:45, 11 July 2024 by SBF2004 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{subst:RfC Page|Should we categorize in-credit logo variations as logo variants?|so, there been a big issue with in-credit logos, especially those from Japan. Back then, before software was available, in-credit logos there had to be done by hand because sometimes, they would draw the in-credit logos in the style of the company's logo or differently (specifically for tv stations and animation studios, like Tatsunoko) and the post-production department who handles all the...")

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This proposal is currently being drafted.

Please do not vote on this RFC yet. If you have comments regarding this RFC, post them in the proper section.

Before submitting your proposal, please ensure that it is compliant with our Requests for Comments guidelines and site rules. Proposals that do not meet these guidelines may be declined or, in cases where the proposal is in violation of the site rules, deleted by reviewing administrators.

It is strongly recommended to go into as much detail as you possibly can with your proposal so that its purpose and what aspects will change if it passes can be conveyed clearly to voters once approved..

Last edited by SBF2004 (talk | contribs) 2 months ago. (Update)

Submit

Should we categorize in-credit logo variations as logo variants?

so, there been a big issue with in-credit logos, especially those from Japan. Back then, before software was available, in-credit logos there had to be done by hand because sometimes, they would draw the in-credit logos in the style of the company's logo or differently (specifically for tv stations and animation studios, like Tatsunoko) and the post-production department who handles all the credit sequences would ultilize the logo for the animation studio or company, either as an in-credit font, or the company's logo (for Tatsunoko, the wordmark can be separate and can lack the symbol, prior to software being available that could allow the full logo to be shown). Is there any solution to this? TheLogoFan2004 (talk) 18:45, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Support

Abstain

Oppose

Comments

Retrieved from "https://www.avid.wiki/AVID:Requests_for_Comment/Should_we_categorize_In-credit_logo_variations_as_logo_variants%3F?oldid=902406"

Category:

Drafted Requests for Comment

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.