AVID:Requests for Comment/Screen ALL future RfCs

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Revision as of 04:30, 21 May 2023 by Eternity Media Group (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{subst:RfC Page|Screen ALL future RfCs|Lately, I've noticed an influx of under-thought, half-baked Requests for Comment, to the point of the RfC landing page being clogged with heavily opposed RfCs. I'm proposing that a system to screen RfCs be implemented in order to keep proposals to a certain standard of quality. I have two possible options in mind, which will be outlined below. ~~~~}} {{subst:RfC Page|Send all RfCs to a staff screening queue|This proposal would be s...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Screen ALL future RfCs

Lately, I've noticed an influx of under-thought, half-baked Requests for Comment, to the point of the RfC landing page being clogged with heavily opposed RfCs. I'm proposing that a system to screen RfCs be implemented in order to keep proposals to a certain standard of quality. I have two possible options in mind, which will be outlined below. (Lets chat!) 04:30, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Support

Abstain

Oppose

Comments

Send all RfCs to a staff screening queue

This proposal would be similar to the Moderator extension, where any RfCs are sent to a queue where AVID staff will discuss the pros and cons of such a proposal, and whether there has been enough thought put into it.

Support

Abstain

Oppose

Comments

Implement an RfC draft system

This would be similar to the RfC draft system at meta.miraheze.org.

Support

Abstain

Oppose

Comments

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.