AVID:Requests for Comment/Rules reform - Remove the "No Stealing Content" rule.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- Closing as passed, with three support votes and zero oppose votes. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 16:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Originally I wrote the suggestion in the Site Rules reform to rename the "No Stealing Content" rule to a name that made more sense.
However, I came to the conclusion that the rule would no longer be logical, due to the fact that AVID is licensed under CC BY-SA, therefore allowing authorized duplication of material on the wiki.
So, I revisited my suggestion, and decided that the rule should be axed entirely. What do you think? ifyoudarethenpizzait aka Compooper (talk) 14:36, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Support
Support This would definitely be good as it would save minutes on typing info. CharlieFiddlesticks (talk) 19:26, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Support Same as CharlieFiddlesticks. 
· Talk · Edits 07:28, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Support Absolutely. Blad (talk) 19:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
