AVID:Requests for Comment/Reimplementing Print Logos

Implementing A New Portal For Print Logos

My First Idea For Reimplementing Print Logos Is To Make A New Portal For Print Logos Where It Would Be A Sub Portal Under Production Logos.Pearno (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Pearno

Support

Support I go to a school with a firewall that blocks Fandom for some reason, so this could come in handy for me. Also, some people might be too lazy to switch from AVID to Logopedia, and I never even saw any reason to get rid of the print logos, so I would be fine with this section returning. Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 11:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

There are several reasons we got rid of print logos. And I can't think of anyone who'd be too lazy to simply change tabs. Trevor807 (talk) 12:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

The reasoning provided for this support is very half-baked in my opinion. It is extremely easy to change tabs, no harder than clicking on a different page button on AVID. I also don't see the purpose of adding hundreds of pages just because one place has a firewall that blocks another site. Eternity Media Group (talk) 01:30, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

1. OpposeForcedExcess26 (talk) 15:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
2. Oppose: Logopedia already does print logos better. That's why we got rid of them in the first place. Trevor807 (talk) 16:48, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
3. Oppose Trevor already explained why the print logos were pulled in the first place (and a RfC that included removing print logos played a role in print logos being removed). Obviously, for the same reason as Trevor (plus the fact that a RfC removed print logos), I'm out. AUnnamedDragon 1:37 PM, July 19, 2023 (CET)
4. Oppose Why can't you just "sign your star". This RfC (with the removal of print logos) was closed with sucessful votes, that's why print logos "were" removed. AZEEM4HADZRIE (🎙 · 📜) 02:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
5. Oppose. Eternity Media Group (talk) 11:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
6. Oppose Number 1 (continued below)
7. Oppose Gilby1385 (talk) 15:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
8. Oppose print logos are NEVER EVER EVER coming back! (Talk to Me!) 08:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
9. Oppose One word. Logopedia. If you want print logos, go on there rather then implementing it again on a website that is CLEARLY about Audiovisual Identity, rather then print logos.
10. Oppose Per everybody, and this user's grammar is terrible by the way. As I Am Demonstrating, He Capitalizes Evey Word In A Sentence. Shawn the Logo Fan 2006 (talk)
11. Oppose Per everyone here. I ain't here for some Logopedia business. Tabit (talk) 12:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Implementing A New Tab For Print Logos

My Second Idea For Reimplementing Print Logos Is To Make A New Tab For Print Logos In The Same Fashion As The VIdeos And Images Tabs Each Logo Has .Pearno (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Pearno

Oppose

1. Oppose For the same reason I opposed proposal 1, I'm out. AUnnamedDragon 1:40 PM, July 19, 2023 (CET)
2. Oppose again. Don't mind what I say on #1. AZEEM4HADZRIE (🎙 · 📜) 02:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
3. Oppose. Eternity Media Group (talk) 11:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
4. (continued from above) Oppose Number 2 (continued below)
5. Oppose Gilby1385 (talk) 15:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
6. Oppose again. Trevor807 (talk) 12:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
7. Oppose ForcedExcess26 (talk) 12:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
8. Oppose same as above (Talk to Me!) 08:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
9. Oppose Per everybody. And Don't Type Like This, Pearno. Shawn the Logo Fan 2006 (talk)

A New Sub Page For Print Logos

My Third And Final Idea To Reimplement Print Logos Is To Make A New Sub Page For Print Logos In The Same Fashion As The Logo Variations And Trailer Variation Tabs On A Page.Pearno (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Pearno

Oppose

1. Oppose None of your proposals work for me. And as a result, you gon' walk away from this RfC with nothing. So for the same reason I opposed the other proposals, yep, I'm out. AUnnamedDragon 1:44 PM, July 19, 2023 (CET)
2. (continued from above) Oppose Number 3 Sorry, but none of your proposals appear to be solid and don't demonstrate why they need to be re-added back to the wiki. Logopedia is already more effective in covering print logos than we ever were in its lifespan here. Compooper (talk) 18:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
3. Oppose Like two above. Do not explain to me why. AZEEM4HADZRIE (🎙 · 📜) 02:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
4. Oppose. Eternity Media Group (talk) 11:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
5. Oppose Gilby1385 (talk) 15:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
6. Oppose It's a no for every single one of these. Didn't we have an RfC similar to this last year? Yeah, still a no for me. 10:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
7. Oppose again. Trevor807 (talk) 12:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
8. Oppose ForcedExcess26 (talk) 12:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
9. Oppose same as above
10. Oppose Same as above Shawn the Logo Fan 2006 (talk)