AVID:Requests for Comment/Reimplementing Print Logos
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Implementing A New Portal For Print Logos
My First Idea For Reimplementing Print Logos Is To Make A New Portal For Print Logos Where It Would Be A Sub Portal Under Production Logos.Pearno (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Pearno
Support
Abstain
Oppose
OpposeForcedExcess26 (talk) 15:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Oppose: Logopedia already does print logos better. That's why we got rid of them in the first place. Trevor807 (talk) 16:48, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Trevor already explained why the print logos were pulled in the first place. Obviously, for the same reason as Trevor, I'm out. AUnnamedDragon 1:37 PM, July 19, 2023 (CET)
Oppose Number 1 (continued below)
Comments
Implementing A New Tab For Print Logos
My Second Idea For Reimplementing Print Logos Is To Make A New Tab For Print Logos In The Same Fashion As The VIdeos And Images Tabs Each Logo Has .Pearno (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Pearno
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose For the same reason I opposed proposal 1, I'm out. AUnnamedDragon 1:40 PM, July 19, 2023 (CET)- (continued from above)
Oppose Number 2 (continued below)
Comments
A New Sub Page For Print Logos
My Third And Final Idea To Reimplement Print Logos Is To Make A New Sub Page For Print Logos In The Same Fashion As The Logo Variations And Trailer Variation Tabs On A Page.Pearno (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Pearno
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose None of your proposals work for me. And as a result, you gon' walk away from this RfC with nothing. So for the same reason I opposed the other proposals, yep, I'm out. AUnnamedDragon 1:44 PM, July 19, 2023 (CET)- (continued from above)
Oppose Number 3 Sorry, but none of your proposals appear to be solid and don't demonstrate why they need to be re-added back to the wiki. Logopedia is already more effective in covering print logos than we ever were in its lifespan here. Compooper (talk) 18:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)