AVID:Requests for Comment/Redefine usage of Technique on still logos
Proposal 1 (Keep as it is currently)
Do nothing with these sections.
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Proposal 2 (Remove all blank Technique sections)
Remove every instance of "Technique: None." as they are considered redundant.
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Proposal 3 (Keep all sections, but replace "None" with the method used to create the still image)
My personal pick. Even still images can have methods of animation or production attached to it. I've already tested this out on a few pages but it seems it didn't really get attention. Notably: Draft:GEICO. These factors have to be considered while writing these descriptions. A logo can't just be made out of thin air. How was it made? I see the current "None" phrase as an artifact of the FX/SFX era where we had to describe the moving objects in the logo. Makes sense, because still logos had no movement. But that's not how the section works anymore. And I feel the current "None" phrase to be out of place when you consider the proper Technique usage.
This is my third proposal. What do you think?
