AVID:Requests for Comment/Print Logo Wiki
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Should we make a dedicated print logo wiki? Sickminecraft45 (talk) 14:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Support
Support An expanded version of AVID that has better assets than Logopedia and more decent moderation than it ONLY focused on print logos (unlike Logopedia where all logos are dedicated) would be a good plan and would be much more welcome than Logopedia. 
(lets talks) 17:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)- Support Adds competition to Logopedia, as AVID is rapidly expanding. JrStudios (talk) 17:55, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- Competition is Flavor. Logopedia has had it too good for too long. We just got our first mention on Defunctland, as Logopedia has had multiple mentions throughout its lifespan. Enough of Mr. I don't wanna start any trouble AVID. We need to do something to reign over logo databases. (lets talks) 18:12, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- Competition is Flavor. Logopedia has had it too good for too long. We just got our first mention on Defunctland, as Logopedia has had multiple mentions throughout its lifespan. Enough of Mr. I don't wanna start any trouble AVID. We need to do something to reign over logo databases.
Oppose
Oppose It would be redundant to Logopedia. Dominicmgm (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)- Oppose This is like combining the issues the print logos as well as the Company Bumpers Wiki have together. Sure, Logopedia did them first and we could possibly find ways to make it stand out from said wiki, but that would also mean it being "poorly maintained and fairly inactive, thus creating a breeding ground for socks and vandals who often contribute their antics there after being blocked on CLG/AVID", as mentioned in the rebranding proposals. Case in point, socks like Qamichelemir59, who consistency creates print logo pages, may flock to this wiki. And as I previously mentioned on said page, much of the print logos are already described on the main articles on this site either as in-credit logos or part of the animated ones. A lot of the content may also borrow heavily from Logopedia, considering that site has many print logo pages and that those are needed to create articles on this wiki. Again, if you want print logos, then go to Logopedia instead of a new wiki that is a half-copy of said site. Camenati (talk) 18:14, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Kid named Logopedia:
(The Third Place) 18:49, 21 November 2022 (UTC) - Oppose Logopedia clone. And I agree with Camenati.
· Talk · Edits 20:02, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
