AVID:Requests for Comment/Logos with Stolen Content section

Logos with Stolen Content

You know how we get new sections everywhere? Well, we should make a section exclusively for companies with logos containing stolen content. I think it's a good way to find the most laziest and unoriginal logos around. Who's with me?!

Support

1. Support tmsl (talk) 06:54, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose because of how useless it is. Youtube videos exist so who... asked? JrStudios (talk) 15:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
2. Oppose Two things: first of all, there is already a category for this albeit in a less subjective way, so a new section dedicated to stolen content feels redundant. Second, the term "stolen content" intertwines with multiple mediums and can even be debated in some cases, whether it'd be sampling a theme from another logo or movie. Camenati (talk) 07:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
3. Oppose Same as Camenati. Plus Logohub already has a proposal to simplify the sections. · Talk · Edits 07:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
4. Oppose
   Obvious minor is obvious.
   Nova (talk) (Logo not final) 13:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

   Just because I made a stolen content RfC doesn't mean I'm a minor. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 13:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

   Why do people now just assume if you make a dumb rfc you are a minor? Is it because of the stuff with that SickMinecraft guy? (• USER TALK! •) 13:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

   I think so. It's just that I really liked the nicknames people put onto logos. I think they're creative (sometimes). Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 18:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

   How dare you associate this with me! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 04:09, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

   Well you reported me just because I made an RfC on nicknames. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

   I apologize about that. I just felt doubtful when I done it. Sickminecraft45 (talk) 15:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

5. Oppose since I first saw (and got scared of) the Nickelodeon Sleeping Boy ident. (The Third Place) 12:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
6. Oppose Kid named Logos with content from other logos: (• USER TALK! •) 13:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
7. Oppose. This already exists, and in a way less subjective way. Dominicmgm (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
8. Oppose Terrible idea! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 04:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
9. Oppose Technically already exists with the "Logos with content from other logos" category. --RobowilOFFICIAL (talk) 18:40, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
10. Oppose since CalvinWilkerson became the next mr. gann (Yes, I purposely spelled his name that way.) SomeGuy (name change coming soon) (talk) 01:43, 17 January 2023 (UTC)