AVID:Requests for Comment/Logos with Stolen Content section
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Logos with Stolen Content
You know how we get new sections everywhere? Well, we should make a section exclusively for companies with logos containing stolen content. I think it's a good way to find the most laziest and unoriginal logos around. Who's with me?!
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose Two things: first of all, there is already a category for this albeit in a less subjective way, so a new section dedicated to stolen content feels redundant. Second, the term "stolen content" intertwines with multiple mediums and can even be debated in some cases, whether it'd be sampling a theme from another logo or movie. Camenati (talk) 07:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)- Oppose Same as Camenati. Plus Logohub already has a proposal to simplify the sections.
· Talk · Edits 07:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC) - Oppose
Obvious minor is obvious.
Nova (talk) (Logo not final) 13:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Just because I made a stolen content RfC doesn't mean I'm a minor. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 13:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose since I first saw (and got scared of) the Nickelodeon Sleeping Boy ident. 13:38, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Kid named Logos with content from other logos:
(• USER TALK! •) 13:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
