AVID:Requests for Comment/Define appropriate use for Requests for Comment
It appears to me that RFCs are starting to be misused for trivial matters. Specifically, there's multiple discussions like AVID:Requests for Comment/Merge the 1st and 2nd Gracie Films logos (alongside other logos nearly identical in appearance) and AVID:Requests for Comment/Separate 1953 and 1956 TCF logos that are far more suited to article talk pages. Therefore I'd like to propose adding the following to the header section of AVID:Requests for Comment in order to clarify the purpose of this mechanism:
"RFCs should be opened about matters concerning the wiki as a whole, such as policy changes, enabling and disabling extensions, and features and ideas which would have significant effect on the wiki as a whole. Do not use this page to start discussions on page-specific matters, such as merges, splits, single category renames or deletions, except where a dispute pertaining to a single page is so significant that discussion on the article talk page has failed to effectively resolve it."
Talk · Edits 23:17, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Support
Support 
· Talk · Edits 23:27, 2 November 2022 (UTC)- One. Hundred. Percent. Support in the world. ifyoudarethenpizzait aka Compooper (talk) 23:36, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose I don't know. Seems kinda mean. CharlieFiddlesticks (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- just mad because your memorial template didnt pass? ;) ifyoudarethenpizzait aka Compooper (talk) 16:05, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
