AVID:Requests for Comment/Ban RfC votes with no writing
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Ban RfC votes with no writing
Should we ban RfC votes that look like this?
Support 
(Talk to Me!) 15:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Abstain (Talk to Me!) 15:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Oppose (Talk to Me!) 15:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
The reason why I would like to see RfC votes banned like the examples above is that they are just a waste of time and voters should give their reason for voting.
If this passes the following punishment for breaking my proposed rule should be:
- 1st offence: A warning
- 2nd offence: A second (and final) warning
- 3rd offence: A one-day ban
- 4th offence: A one-week ban
So is my new proposed RfC voting rule a good idea? (Talk to Me!) 15:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose While some reasoning for a vote would be helpful, sometimes people may not be able to describe their exact reason or the reasons that they have for voting have been said by everyone else. Imo I don't think we should force people to give reasonings for their votes if they don't want to. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 16:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Cattotld (talk) 16:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Hibiscus. (not gonna lie I found Cattot's opposal pretty funny, as it is literally ironizing this RfC even more) VPJHuk (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- I apologize for what I'm about to because it's against the spirit of what this RfC is proposing, but I shall not let an opportunity go wasted as it was my vote anyway, so here goes:
