AVID:Requests for Comment/Ban RfC votes with no writing

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Revision as of 15:56, 5 February 2023 by Sickminecraft45 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{subst:RfC Page|Ban RfC votes with no writing|Should we ban RfC votes that look like this? {{Support}} ~~~~ {{Abstain}} ~~~~ {{Oppose}} ~~~~ The reason why I would like to see RfC votes banned like the examples above is that they are just a waste of time and voters should give their reason for voting. If this passes the following punishment for breaking my proposed rule should be: * 1st offence: A warning * 2nd offence: A second {and final) warning *...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Ban RfC votes with no writing

Should we ban RfC votes that look like this?

Support (Talk to Me!) 15:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

 Abstain (Talk to Me!) 15:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Oppose (Talk to Me!) 15:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

The reason why I would like to see RfC votes banned like the examples above is that they are just a waste of time and voters should give their reason for voting.

If this passes the following punishment for breaking my proposed rule should be:

  • 1st offence: A warning
  • 2nd offence: A second {and final) warning
  • 3rd offence: A one-day ban
  • 4th offence: A one-week ban

So is my new proposed RfC voting rule a good idea? (Talk to Me!) 15:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Support

Abstain

Oppose

Comments

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.