AVID:Requests for Comment/Since MDY and DMY date formats are being used accordingly, why not use the YMD date format as well?

Since MDY and DMY date formats are being used accordingly, why not use the YMD date format as well?
Back in February, before I joined the Miraheze site, there was a RfC proposal involving use of date formats according to country of origin. The proposal was passed of course, but one date format was not brought up in that proposal: the year-month-day format used in Japan.

Given how American, Canadian, and Filipino logos and other such audiovisual things must use the MDY format (i.e. September 1, 2023) and British and Australian audiovisual things, including logos, must use the DMY format (i.e. 1 September 2023), why not require Japanese logos and what not (e.g. Studio Ghibli and Capcom) to use the YMD format (i.e. 2023 September 1)?

What are your thoughts? --AUnnamedDragon 10:21 PM, September 1, 2023 (CET)

Support

 * 1) Could do, I guess. Gilby1385 (talk) 22:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) T807sig.png · Talk · Edits 22:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) ForcedExcess26 (talk) 00:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 4) I'm confused on why this hasn't been a thing yet tbh Tabit (talk) 01:42, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 5) The ISO format is very accessibility friendly. VenusandMars77 (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 6) Also for:

Ashley Taylor ft. Cure Finale (soulbond friend) and CW/RB (account manager w/ shared pet) (talk) 09:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * China
 * South Korea
 * North Korea
 * Taiwan
 * Hungary
 * Mongolia
 * Lithuania
 * Bhutan


 * 1)  x2 added support again because Chloafifteen oppeses this RfC, lmao. Ashley Taylor ft. Cure Finale (soulbond friend) and CW/RB (account manager w/ shared pet) (talk) 07:52, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * You can't support a proposal twice. Logoarto (talk) 08:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) I believe it should be the other way around. Allowing any kind of date format to be used makes nn/nn/nn cases ambiguous, potentially causing trouble for editors and readers. I want to make it known that this serves as both a counterpoint to this and the already passed RfC; it makes no sense to oppose a third format without opposing a second format. Chloafifteen (talk) 10:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) per Chloe. Logoarto (talk) 09:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) Per above. I feel like this is one of the situations where consistency is more important than appeasing every single group. Eternity Media Group (talk) 09:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 4) per everyone else in this section. Charlie179 (talk) 10:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)