Talk:No Limits Fun (Philippines)

Should this page even exist?
I find everything about this "company" VERY disturbing and I don't know whether it should even be here. We describe logos, but what should be our limits? Indeed, I'm not going to call you out without evidence Camenati, but I'm deeply concerned as to how you even found this logo in the first place. I'm actually starting to wonder if this page can even exist under Miraheze guidelines, though I'm not an expert on those and the answer is probably yes. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 05:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)


 * At the very least, if the page stays, we're gonna need to make it more clear than just saying "very dark themes" in the NSFW in regards to how royally effed this all is. I can expect many people running into this page imagining something akin to our other NSFW logos like just some nudity or swearing, only to find something that is up there with the absolute worst of Lost Media Wiki's NSFL category. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 05:22, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I actually found that image on a Google Images search, specifically from a VK.com community webpage about Peter Scully and the video in question. I can assure you there are absolutely no links to that video, just an image of the logo in good quality.
 * I tried explaining the company in brief detail to give a little description of what they are and their practices. No sexual acts are mentioned in the page (I am aware that porno in text form is strictly prohibited here). Additionally, there is nothing their logo that makes it offensive, although the silhouette may bring debates on whether or not it is too obscene to show. There are many other pages that has women posing suggestively but there is no indication of nudity or pornographic gestures to be seen here and NLF's logo may perhaps be the case since this is a silhouette after all and a pose involving one hand on hips while cigar is held is relatively minor and nothing like one putting particular emphasis on her privates (that is seriously wrong on many levels and is absolutely exemptive). But that's just my opinion.
 * And yeah, some of the things mention in this site such as CP, trafficking, torture, and more are like questions if whether or not even a brief glimpse on these topics are acceptable to be presented on this site or should be omitted entirely. After all, there are logos that deal with these type of themes and the site is "dedicated to the discovery and preservation of on-screen production logos and station IDs from all around the world". Camenati (talk) 05:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for replying. I'm glad that you didn't find the logo "in the wild", you had me scared there for a second. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 05:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The fact that Scully's history and this website exists is much more distrubing than another Filipino logo, the second Regal Films logo. LMgamer36 (2020, 2022-present).webp (Visit my talk page!) 06:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Wow. Just...just wow. --Cassie Grandstaff (talk) 06:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Honestly, at this point, I am more polarized if whether or not even a silhouette of a girl in such a pose is acceptable or not. Not as extreme as the other gesture I've mentioned, but this IS a minor we're dealing with. Camenati (talk) 07:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * "Very dark themes" is understatement of the year. Cassie Grandstaff (talk) 07:37, 20 July 2022 (UTC)