User talk:Beatrizburle

-- WelcomeBot (talk) 21:18, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Regarding your recent edits to Spin Master Entertainment
Hello, Beatrizburle and thank you for your contributions to the wiki. It appears you are adding a prediction to to said page by stating the 2023 logo will appear on a fictious movie (The Little Charmers Movie, to be specific). Please note these two things: Thank you for your understanding of these specific rules. Camenati (talk) 04:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) We do not allow predictions in the wiki as there is a possibility they can be incorrect if it turns out to not be the case, resulting in the wiki spreading false information.
 * 2) Fictious information is not permitted in mainspace or draftspace articles, as the aim of the wiki is to be an accurate database on the information of various identities. If you want to present your fictious additions to the wiki, you may do so on your associated userpages such as your sandbox.

Regarding your legacy section edits to Living Dead Guy Productions
Hello, Beatrizburle. The Legacy section is not a place to state opinions based on one's sole judgement. We want to avoid inserting POV into articles as the whole point of them is to be informative. not a blog someone writes giving their own perspective and opinions regarding a subject. In that regard, the opinionated Legacy sections stick out from the rest of the factual-driven article and should be avoided for a consistent and formal tone. Thank you for your understanding. Camenati (talk) 22:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Warning regarding technique misuse
Hello, Beatrizburle. There are two things to note regarding the Technique section: Considering you have received several warnings regarding editing guidelines, you may be temporarily blocked from editing the wiki and will be strongly encouraged to re-read the tutorial guide if you break another, or the same, editing guideline. Thank you for your understanding. Camenati (talk) 02:28, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Stating "None" for the technique is considered misuse, as we now considered that as creating logos out of thin air. Instead, describe the animation style or technique used in still logos by stating they are "a still, digital graphic" or "a image traditionally painted on a card", etc.
 * 2) We do not state the moving objects in the technique section. Again, the section is to describe what animation technique is used to animate or design the logo. In that context, stating the logo was animated with a shape or beam does not make sense.