AVID:Requests for Permissions

Oppose

 * 1) Unfortunately, I must  due to a lack of proper reasoning. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (Lets chat!) 00:07, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments

 * 1)  The voting is still early. If I were you I'd address the above concern and provide more of a reason related to the responsibilities and how you'd use them. As it stands this request leans on 'time sunk fallacy' - simply making edits qualifies you as a decent editor, not as a staff member on its own. --Raidarr (talk) 14:53, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) for all your major contributions recently. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (Lets chat!) 12:57, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) Signal boost for this; Nova appears to have a clear record, a level head and a strong contribution history. --Raidarr (talk) 14:57, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) This user is very active over on our Discord and has shown a lot of improvement over the last few months. Definitely has my support. Luke2505 (talk) 12:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) Very surprised you aren't a Moderator yet. You have my full support. Compooper (talk) 12:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Luke2505. Cattotld (talk) 12:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 4) per Luke.   Logohub   (talk) 12:39, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 5) per everyone above. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 21:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Absolutely! You've proven yourself as a valuable part of the staff team in the Discord, and I can't wait to see what you bring to the wiki. Compooper (talk) 12:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) per Compooper. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (Lets chat!) 12:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) {{Support}} has been a great help to the community.  Logohub   (talk) 12:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 4) {{Support|strong}} per Compooper sig.png Talk ·&#32;Edits 02:36, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) as your reasoning is solely relying on the Parkee incident. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (Lets chat!) 13:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) per EMG.   Logohub   (talk) 13:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) as per everyone above Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg   (Talk to Me!) 21:09, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * OK, I get it. You've put me down. I just don't know how to track socks or vandals. Now I'm sad. Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 21:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Ideally, you need to feel as if you are competent in your ability as a moderator before you apply. You managed to do one good thing - which was reporting to the admins when the Parkee incident went down - so this is already a good step in the right direction. Make sure you do more stuff like that in the future as well as contributing to the content of the site itself.
 * Seeing as you say you're just over the age restriction means you've got plenty of time to perfect your abilities before you apply. Use the time wisely. Luke2505 (talk) 22:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok... Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 12:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * The key here is building a record of positive action. Something you can point to without any single incident being important because they all build you up. I'd also suggest being in contact with more people, such as existing mods/admins and having their feedback directly apply to you so you can work towards the expected standard. --Raidarr (talk) 22:43, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * You didn't provide any reasoning as to why you should be a mod. Also, after re-reading it while giving my honest opinion, I can safely say I did not understand what you're trying to get at here. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 16:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ I edited it and now I have my reason on it! Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg  (Talk to Me!) 21:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * as your reasonkng only relies on your edit count. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (Lets chat!) 21:41, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Your additions haven't explained why you'd be a good choice for the role, you're just explaining that you want this. My position on the matter remains firm. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (Lets chat!) 12:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I notice you said " I want to give it a crack and see how I can manage to have this new role" and unfortunately this isn't really the way you wanna be going about things when you're asking for elevated powers on a Wiki such as AVID, even at the lowest level. You need to ensure you know how the site works and are confident in your ability as a moderator before you apply. Luke2505 (talk) 22:39, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I know how this wiki works and I'm prepared and confident to have the powers. Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg  (Talk to Me!) 05:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅. I have added more info on why I should and want to become an admin, and I hope to get some support votes! Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg  (Talk to Me!) 05:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Your reason provided to become a moderator is because you wanna be staff so it helps you get the admin hat. I wanna be staff so I can be staff and become higher staff isn't how it works. I would not suggest applying until you get clear reasons that pertain to the responsibility of the role. I do not think you have what it takes to be a moderator because you don't seem to know what it is about. Do not continue to edit to try and say what you think people want to hear: I would instead suggest you retract, figure out the fundamentals and get a stronger background before attempting to enter a staff role. --Raidarr (talk) 22:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * per everyone else.
 * . I warned you that it takes more than just raw numbers to become a moderator/admin. But to testify against you, you have an incredibly toxic attitude towards RfCs you oppose and can be aggressive towards some people (especially towards people you don't like); and I hold a strong feeling you'll take advantage of your new-found powers to take out your "rivals" - in short, going against what the community stands for. You also show an incredible lack of self-awareness of mistakes, and show little desire to change your thinking or your methods - it always has to be pointed out. In short, you need a lot of work in order to come even close to the moderation role. However, I do understand - stressful situations are tough. Perhaps you could find ways to improve yourself? I'm not sure. Either way, I'm still opposing until greater change has been seen from you. Solarstrike (talk) 00:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't recall behaving badly on RfCs but I "accidently" went a bit rude on some of the Featured Images nominees when it first started which I didn't know broke any rules as I was warned for that. Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg  (Talk to Me!) 17:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Support
User does a lot of work cleaning up articles. Although you have been subject to some warnings, and the attitude is, well, something, I do think you have a shot at becoming admin, one way or another. Doctorine Dark (talk) 08:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

I'd like to see you become an admin! I think you have the responsibility and courage to have the second biggest role on this wiki! (Talk to Me!) 19:55, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Per Doctorine Luke2505 (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

per everyone else. Logohub

. Talk ·&#32;Edits 23:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC) Hb1290

Bureaucracy
No requests

Support
Doctorine Dark (talk) 16:06, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) He has been inactive for sometime now.   Logohub   (talk) 09:37, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I will this, but not without giving my thanks to you for your duties as admin over the past 8 years. I wish you the best in your future endeavors. Compooper (talk) 11:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


 * 1) It goes without saying I must thank Cooley for his years of service, he has been an admin for as long as I can remember. While the recent revelations are disappointing I wish Cooley all the best going forward. Luke2505 (talk) 11:55, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


 * 1) C̴̣̳̟͇̳͓̀̆̿Ā̸̛̛̝͎̗̲̯̲̰͠M̷̢̯̗̱͎̗̰̈̌̎͜E̶͖̪̽̓͒N̵̗̘̩͇̫̭̤̙̈́̑͜A̸̼̫̯̮̼̟̲̫̲̍̈́̐͑̑̓̎̀̎̍̀͜T̵̡̨̧̪̼͓̜͉͇͎́I̵̧͍̥̗͕͐ͅ 18:18, 6 February 2023 (UTC)