AVID:Requests for Comment/Negatively-recieved logos section

How to find hated logos
So, there are some logos around who have been hated for its animation, simplicity, music, cheesiness, omnipresence, a hated rebrand etc. I'm thinking we should make a category that features companies with logos with a ton of haters. That way, we can spite the creation of the logo easier.

Support

 * 1)  NLiteChannel.jpg (The Third Place) 16:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 2)  Sounds cool! Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg   (Talk to Me!) 15:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) This seems more like opinion, but doesn't this harken back to the CLG wiki days? IAmThe789Guy (talk) 15:06, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) I don't love the idea. Opens the door to biased opinions and all that. For that reason I'm out. Compooper (talk) 16:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) As said by Compooper, would likely see biased opinions being inserted on a regular basis. Plus, technically the Legacy section is able to mention if there's a general consensus within the logo community that certain logos are bad, so I personally feel this proposal is kinda moot because of that. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 16:51, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * No, just no. The Legacy section is just fitting, per Hibiscus. Doctorine Dark (talk) 16:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) per everyone else. We got rid of Cheesy Factors and Scare Factors for being too opinionated. This idea is no less opinionated. T807sig.png · Talk · Edits 20:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) per everyone.   Logohub   (talk) 15:45, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) Too based on opinion. Film4 (talk) 16:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 4) I'll go straight to the point. This is far too opinionated for a wiki, a place that's supposed to give information to us. Informational pages aren't supposed to give opinions rather than information to it's own. Admittedly, everyone has made this point, but I gave a reason why we think that way. VPJHuk (talk) 16:29, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 110% this. T807sig.png · Talk · Edits 21:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) SnowflakesOmega (talk) 16:06, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) YouTube compilations exist for a reason. User:Luli Logo (Talk “coming soon”) February 6, 2023 17:17 (UTC)
 * 3) Never go back to the Qualitipedia direction ever again per everyone else. Aside from that this is pointless since the Legacy table is already useful for telling the reception of the logo. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 12:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments
Since everyone is against this, I request SNOW closure.
 * This might be a good idea for a series on the AVID Channel, where OP can talk about Negatively Received logos. Luke2505 (talk) 12:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Never thought about that. Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 12:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)