AVID:Featured Media Nominations

File:Rare nick turkey logo.png
Reason: This logo was seen on only one source and has a byline of 1989. Because of this, this is the true first Nickelodeon Productions logo (• USER TALK! •) 20:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Support
This is surprisingly fascinating to see! I never expected a logo even EARLIER than the haypile. This is the definition of an underrated gem of a discovery. VinegarPop '' (talk) 20:28, January 6, 2023 (UTC)

SnowflakesOmega (talk) 23:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Per VinegarPop. Doctorine Dark (talk) 11:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

WNET New York (1982 - Great Performances).png
Reason: Notable discovery due to having no footage until last month. Nova (talk) (Logo not final) 19:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Support
holy twilight sparkle (The Third Place) 21:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC) Cool find (• USER TALK! •) 21:51, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

WBITV (AOL Byline and Extended, 2000s).png
Reason: This logo by itself is extremely rare, but it having the AOL byline? That is next level. This is also significant company-wise, as it's something from Warner Bros. VPJHuk (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  alright Compooper (talk) 19:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC)


 * 1)  Nice Rainbow charlie signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 00:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Krad016.jpg
Reason: This Is an Unused CBC logo from 1974 and This is the only image we have of it. (My Talk Page) 17:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Support
(The Third Place) 18:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC) Per Doctorine Dark. Some people just vote because of rarity.

Oppose

 * 1) This seems like it would've been very hard to find, sure. But the impact this had on the community was almost nothing. We have a whole lot of lost logos still being found. And with that amount of busy people, nobody seems to care about this one.   VinegarPop   (talk) 17:41, January 6, 2023 (UTC)
 * But it's not about the significance of the logo. It's about its rarity. Doctorine Dark (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

rede globo 2000 logo
20thcenturyfox1981 (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)|File:Rede Globo (2000).jpg20thcenturyfox1981 (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)]] 20thcenturyfox1981 (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC) Reason: this logo looks great, doesn't it?

Oppose
As Logohub said about Touchstone Home Video, this isn't really significant enough to warrant a feature. (name change coming soon) 16:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * not really significant.  Logohub   (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Not significant. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Doctorine Dark (talk) 11:29, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

disney logo 2006
20thcenturyfox1981 (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)|File:EF963F9C-2658-45A0-B19F-4BA32176B414.jpeg20thcenturyfox1981 (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)]] 20thcenturyfox1981 (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)|200px|right]] Reason: nothing can't beat the iconic castle

Support
only because of how iconic it is. Also your formatting is disgusting. (name change coming soon) 16:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose
simply because it's nothing significant. While yes, it's an iconic logo, that's all the value it has for the normal version (which you seem to have posted). VPJHuk (talk) 16:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * per VPJHuk.  Logohub   (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

I don't get what is rare or significant about this. It is just the Disney logo. (• USER TALK! •) 18:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

C'mon, everyone already knows this. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Too common a logo. Dominicmgm (talk) 11:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

I know it's an iconic logo, but definitely not feature-worthy since it's almost everywhere. (Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 11:25, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Touchstone Home Video (1989).jpg
Reason: It's just that versions of famous logos with altered looks fascinate me. It looks really different compared to the movie logo (I know it's a home video logo, so it's not supposed to look exactly like the movie logo). Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 15:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose
Not rare or significant. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 23:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * , because it's not a really significant logo IMO.  Logohub   (talk) 15:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

File:TAT1979.png
Reason: A very rare logo thats very famous.

Support

 * 1)   Logohub   (talk) 17:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) CalvinWilkerson-transformed.png(The Third Place) 18:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) This was featured in the original Wikifoundry CLG back in the day, and considering other WF features were re-featured, I don't see why this can't. VPJHuk (talk) 19:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 4)  Solely because it's one of the rarest finds we've had. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 19:58, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 5) Since this was featured on the old Wikifoundry site, it's a no-brainer. Dominicmgm (talk) 11:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * , How are we supposed to know if it's good if it hasn't been found yet?  VinegarPop   (talk) 17:19, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * it's not about how good it looks, but rather how significant it is for the community.  Logohub   (talk) 17:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 1)  This is a screenshot from Broken Saw's video. If it wasn't from the 1980 rerun, I would support. Rainbow charlie signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 17:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

30th Television (2011).jpg
Reason: Before this find, all we knew of a 30th Television logo was a hella cheap version that nobody really liked. Those were found in syndicated prints. This new find by me is from a sales tape from 2011. VPJHuk (talk) 11:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) sig.png Talk ·&#32;Edits 11:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 2)   Logohub   (talk) 11:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) Compooper (talk) 11:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 4) Whenever we find something like this or a new logo is launched it should be immediately considered for featuring. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (name change coming soon) 11:43, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 5)  Rainbow charlie signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 13:52, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 6)  Tabit Signature.png (Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 14:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 7)   VinegarPop   (talk) 17:25, January 6, 2023 (UTC)
 * 8) T807sig.png · Talk · Edits 22:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 9) Supreme Raridade lol Thesquidgeeks (talk) 8:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) All it is is just the normal 20th Television logo with a 3 instead of a 2. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 16:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * While the appeal isn't the most satisfying one, the real reason I posted it was due to it's rarity as well as it probably interesting a couple others. This is also a way better version of the 30th Television logo than the one we got in syndication. You can see that one here. Shame it wasn't used in the actual show. VPJHuk (talk) 16:50, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Lmao tell it to 30th Century Fox TV. This find is neat Rainbow charlie signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 18:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments
first nomination ever

Bell System (1941).png & others
Reasons:
 * The 1941 Bell System logo was found on Telephone History: "Long Distance", which in turn can be found here.
 * The 1983 Bell System logo was found on a March 1, 1983 airing of The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour. I actually expected the 2nd AT&T logo to be there, but I guess I got a surprise. This can be found here.
 * The rest was found on a Bell System/AT&T logo history video. They are all seen here.

Oppose

 * , In what situation would anyone vote for these?  VinegarPop   (talk) 17:27, January 6, 2023 (UTC)
 * Idk. Thought they were rare enough to be posted here. I don't blame you. Doctorine Dark (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Jerry Bruckheimer Films (Kangaroo Jack, Theatrical A).jpg and File:Jerry Bruckheimer Films (Kangaroo Jack, Theatrical B).jpg
Reason: This was actually found by someone on Twitter, but video has since been deleted and only these images exist.

Support

 * 1)  Doctorine Dark (talk) 11:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments

 * 1) What rare about this? Thesquidgeeks (talk) 8:31, January 7, 2023 (UTC)