AVID:Requests for Comment/Add "Investigation Needed" as an Availability tier

I have been testing this on the Clip-On libraries to tell that more captures are needed in order to determine where it falls in the Availability scale. (Talk!) 23:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Support
* (The Third Place) 20:51, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * yes, when I wrote the PopCap Games page I did not investigate enough ForcedExcess26 (talk) 23:43, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Great idea! Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg  (Talk to Me!) 09:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Abstain
#, both sides are making good points (The Third Place) 23:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * the oppose side hasn't even replied yet ForcedExcess26 (talk) 23:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I think he's just trying to hedge his bets either way. Solarstrike (talk) 20:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) as a standalone tier. I don’t think it needs to be an Availability tier, I think it should be stated after a standard Availability tier, e.g. "Rare, but it may need more investigation to confirm." Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (Lets chat!) 23:56, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) for similar reasons as EMG. Solarstrike (talk) 20:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Support
After rethinking, this would be better. (Talk!) 23:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

· Talk · Edits 23:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

as I feel this idea would work far better. It communicates that we are not 100% confident with our understanding of the logo, whilst also showing what we know so far. (Lets chat!) 01:12, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

for this incarnation. Solarstrike (talk) 02:56, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

(The Third Place) 12:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Abstain
I think it's a better idea as a tier. (Talk to Me!) 09:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)