AVID:Requests for Comment/Logos with Stolen Content section

Logos with Stolen Content
You know how we get new sections everywhere? Well, we should make a section exclusively for companies with logos containing stolen content. I think it's a good way to find the most laziest and unoriginal logos around. Who's with me?!

Oppose

 * 1)  Two things: first of all, there is already a category for this albeit in a less subjective way, so a new section dedicated to stolen content feels redundant. Second, the term "stolen content" intertwines with multiple mediums and can even be debated in some cases, whether it'd be sampling a theme from another logo or movie. Camenati (talk) 07:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 2)  Same as Camenati. Plus Logohub already has a proposal to simplify the sections. T807sig.png · Talk · Edits 07:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) Obvious minor is obvious. Novastar.pngNova (talk) (Logo not final) 13:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Just because I made a stolen content RfC doesn't mean I'm a minor. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 13:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Why do people now just assume if you make a dumb rfc you are a minor? Is it because of the stuff with that SickMinecraft guy? DW Signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 13:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I think so. It's just that I really liked the nicknames people put onto logos. I think they're creative (sometimes). Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 18:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 1)  since I first saw (and got scared of) the Nickelodeon Sleeping Boy ident. 13:38, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) Kid named Logos with content from other logos: DW Signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 13:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) . This already exists, and in a way less subjective way. Dominicmgm (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)