AVID:Featured Media Nominations

Paramount_Pictures-Walt_Disney_Productions_(1980).jpg
Reason: The fact that it was highly obscure until it was found in (I believe) 2022, as well as the fact that both a Disney and Paramount logo are on-screen at the same time, which is very rare occurence. --RobowilOFFICIAL (talk) 04:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  When this was first found, my jaw dropped. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 05:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 2)  I would like to see this nominated considering that outside of this (and Miramax stuff), the only times I've seen Disney interact with other Paramount is with Marvel's The Avengers and Iron Man 3.... Snorunt (talk) 07:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Viacom Community Access Northshore (1988).jpeg
Reason: This version of the V of Steel is very odd, as it has not only a cheap text, but also has the mark of it's community Cable TV division, one which isn't talked about much. In that sense, not only it's rare, but its an interesting piece of history of a significant television-related company.

Support
It's kinda sad that Featured Image Nominations might actually replace Surprise Logo Discoveries in terms of activity and images. Anyways, this is a neat find. (• USER TALK! •) 19:58, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Nikkatsu Corporation (1998 - Ayane's High Kick - Central Park Media print).png
Reason: This is kind of an obscure discovery, it was initially discovered in 2020, and was only added to AVID 2 years later. Nova (talk) (Logo not final) 16:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Paramount Pictures (Textless, 1967).png
Reason: This is the 6th logo from Paramount Pictures, but one big key difference is that this is possibly the only variant that doesn't contain any text whatsoever. (Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 12:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Support
Holy piez (• USER TALK! •) 16:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

I recall this being featured in the original Wikifoundry CLG Wiki, and with other WF features retaining their feature, I think this should too. Otherwise, this is a pretty intriguing and rare find. VPJHuk (talk) 19:19, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

The coolest find you ever done. WOW! (Talk/Edits) 20:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments
The embedded YouTube video of the logo is no longer viewable due to deleted YouTube account. Is there any othet upload of it? --Axel (talk) 07:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Why yes, there is. https://youtu.be/ESr1hH-8cI4 Tabit Signature.png (Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 09:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Warner Music Video (1985).jpg
Reason: This music logo is another 'no chance of finding' logo by WB. Also, why is the text English, when the logo is exclusive to a Japanese tape? Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 17:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Support
The blue looks good on the Big W (• USER TALK! •) 16:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

DCUnusedFrame2005.jpg
Reason: This is a frame of an unused DC Entertainment logo I found on the 2005 Imaginary Forces website via the Wayback Machine. There were other style frames, but they are all broken links so this is the only surviving one. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 18:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Support
(The Third Place) 19:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

(Talk/Edits) 15:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Hanna Barbera Poland and P.P. Polskie Nagrania (1988) (From - Polish Magila Gorila VHS).png
Reason: Hanna-Barbera, a world-famous production company, responsible for Yogi Bear, Scooby-Doo, Dexter's Lab, Top Cat etc. teams up with P.P. Polskie Nagrania, a random obscure Polish record company with absolutely nothing to do with cartoons. Wut? Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 16:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose
Not really rare as this logo has been uploaded numerous times. And not really significant, due to the fact that besides the relation to HB, not much is known about this company. (• USER TALK! •) 18:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)


 * for the same reasons Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (name change coming soon) 18:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Per. (Talk/Edits) 15:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Wbdptvcnf.png
Reason: This is one of (if not) the rarest logo WB has pulled out. It has only been found on 2 sources, and if you try to look for it outside of YouTube, don't bother. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 15:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments
It is already featured. (• USER TALK! •) 15:50, 8 January 2023 (UTC)


 * OK. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 16:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Spiffy Pictures Website Prototype Logo.png
Reason: This was discovered not too long ago and for a while people just thought it was fake due to the fan made on screen logo. Thanks to the discovery and the significance of Spiffy Pictures in the logo community, it is safe to say that this deserves a spot in the features due to being a prototype and the significance of the logo on the AVID wiki and the logo community in general. (• USER TALK! •) 03:25, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Support
Good find! AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC) That reason is really important. (Talk/Edits) 15:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 1)  while i don't exactly do rare finds (the one logo find i have on my youtube channel is the 2018 fremantle logo) im down for this CalvinWilkerson-transformed.png(The Third Place) 04:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Screenshot_2021-02-26_at_9.22.19_AM.png
Reason: This underrated brand needs to be recognized again, especially for Flying Rhino Junior High fans.

Oppose
Not a rare or significant logo. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC) (Talk/Edits) 15:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments
I really doubt your nomination User:Luli Logo (Talk) January 8, 2023 23:40 (UTC)

Mark V International logo.jpg
Reason: It's the rarest find I ever uploaded to this wiki. Also the source where I extracted it is rare too (Peppermint Park to be more exact). Luli Logo (talk) 19:32, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  Peppermint Park needs a remake. It deserves more love, and a remake should give it that love. -HavocMan2000, 2:45 PM, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Amblin1983.webp
Reason: Rare prototype Amblin Entertainment logo (The Third Place) 13:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Support
. What a fantastic find! Dominicmgm (talk) 14:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

This wins my vote because Amblin made Animaniacs (• USER TALK! •) 15:09, 7 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Let's not forget WB's role in it. They distributed the show and aired it on Kids WB, Cartoon Network, Boomerang and Nickelodeon (for some reason). Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 15:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * and Fox Kids Rainbow charlie signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 15:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose
because according to this article, it is not an on-screen logo but a door sign.

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2016/10/09/alibaba-pictures-amblin-to-co-produce-films-for-global-chinese-audience.html --Axel (talk) 23:40, 7 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Crap CalvinWilkerson-transformed.png(The Third Place) 23:53, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * It's still cool so I support Rainbow charlie signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 23:58, 7 January 2023 (UTC)


 * 1) Not an on-screen logo   Logohub   (talk) 14:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

I've seen this logo before you requested it; i've seen it in Logopedia, a wiki in Fandom. (Talk/Edits) 15:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Two Soups Productions early logo.jpeg
Reason: It turns out that the logo with those kids was not the only logo they had. This was found back on September 29 last year. I was on YouTube finding full episodes of long gone shows and one of these was Teachers (2006, NBC). The videos I found of that show mostly cut off the credits (which were original airings), but one of them actually showed a partial logo combo (meaning it cut off NBC Studios), which is how I got this capture. SuperMax124 (talk) 13:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Support
Now that's rare indeed! Doctorine Dark (talk) 13:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Rare nick turkey logo.png
Reason: This logo was seen on only one source and has a byline of 1989. Because of this, this is the true first Nickelodeon Productions logo (• USER TALK! •) 20:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Support
This is surprisingly fascinating to see! I never expected a logo even EARLIER than the haypile. This is the definition of an underrated gem of a discovery. VinegarPop '' (talk) 20:28, January 6, 2023 (UTC)

SnowflakesOmega (talk) 23:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Per VinegarPop. Doctorine Dark (talk) 11:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

since Frank Zappa dropped Sheik Yerbouti in 1979. (The Third Place) 13:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)


 * In 1979 Columbia Pictures had it's (in my opinion) best logo; The Sunburst. Rainbow charlie signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 20:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

 Logohub   (talk) 14:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

(Talk/Edits) 15:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

A very suprising find to me considering that most Nickelodeon logos I know of are from 1991 and onward. So a Nickelodeon logo (with MTV mentioned as opposed to no byline) is a pretty neat find! Snorunt (talk) 21:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

WNET New York (1982 - Great Performances).png
Reason: Notable discovery due to having no footage until last month. Nova (talk) (Logo not final) 19:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Support
holy twilight sparkle (The Third Place) 21:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Cool find (• USER TALK! •) 21:51, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Finally after all these years, one lost media less. User:Luli Logo (Talk)

Holy crap. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

(Talk/Edits) 15:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

WBITV (AOL Byline and Extended, 2000s).png
Reason: This logo by itself is extremely rare, but it having the AOL byline? That is next level. This is also significant company-wise, as it's something from Warner Bros. VPJHuk (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  alright Compooper (talk) 19:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC)


 * 1)  Nice Rainbow charlie signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 00:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose
I think the one I've nominated is just a bit rarer. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 15:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

I don't see it as a competition though. Your nomination is pretty good too, but it shouldn't be a factor as to why another should be opposed VPJHuk (talk) 10:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)


 * No it's not. VPJHuk's is better in my opinion. Sorry Rainbow charlie signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 16:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Krad016.jpg
Reason: This Is an Unused CBC logo from 1974 and This is the only image we have of it. (My Talk Page) 17:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Support
(The Third Place) 18:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC) Per Doctorine Dark. Some people just vote because of rarity.

This find is awesome. Now I'm wondering, how this picture look like as a video logo? User:Luli Logo (User talk:Luli Logo) January 7, 2023 19:23 (UTC)

Even though I know next to nothing about CBC, this looks like a pretty cool find and CBC is significant enough (• USER TALK! •) 15:54, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

(Talk/Edits) 15:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) This seems like it would've been very hard to find, sure. But the impact this had on the community was almost nothing. We have a whole lot of lost logos still being found. And with that amount of busy people, nobody seems to care about this one.   VinegarPop   (talk) 17:41, January 6, 2023 (UTC)
 * But it's not about the significance of the logo. It's about its rarity. Doctorine Dark (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

rede globo 2000 logo
20thcenturyfox1981 (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC) Reason: this logo looks great, doesn't it?

Oppose
simply because it's nothing significant. While yes, it's an iconic logo, that's all the value it has for the normal version (which you seem to have posted). VPJHuk (talk) 16:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * per VPJHuk.  Logohub   (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

I don't get what is rare or significant about this. It is just the Disney logo. (• USER TALK! •) 18:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

C'mon, everyone already knows this. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Too common a logo. Dominicmgm (talk) 11:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

I know it's an iconic logo, but definitely not feature-worthy since it's almost everywhere. (Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 11:25, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Doctorine Dark (talk) 13:10, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Easy to find. (Talk/Edits) 15:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose
As Logohub said about Touchstone Home Video, this isn't really significant enough to warrant a feature. (name change coming soon) 16:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * not really significant.  Logohub   (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Not significant. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Doctorine Dark (talk) 11:29, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments
== disney logo 2006 20thcenturyfox1981 (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)|200px|right]] Reason: nothing can't beat the iconic castle

Support
only because of how iconic it is. Also your formatting is disgusting. (name change coming soon) 16:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose
simply because it's nothing significant. While yes, it's an iconic logo, that's all the value it has for the normal version (which you seem to have posted). VPJHuk (talk) 16:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * per VPJHuk.  Logohub   (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

I don't get what is rare or significant about this. It is just the Disney logo. (• USER TALK! •) 18:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

C'mon, everyone already knows this. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Too common a logo. Dominicmgm (talk) 11:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

I know it's an iconic logo, but definitely not feature-worthy since it's almost everywhere. (Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 11:25, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Doctorine Dark (talk) 13:10, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Too common to be featured here and was used for 16 years in a good number of films (including a few non-Disney films such as Ponyo and The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild (was originally a Fox movie before the big merge of 2019) to name a few). --Snorunt (talk) 02:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

this logo is like the exact opposite of rare. i've torrented two movies with this logo (the wreck-it ralph movies btw) so this is not getting featured (The Third Place) 04:31, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

I know that I like this logo, but this isn't rare or interesting for this nominations. I know it's iconic, but not THAT much. It doesn't need to be featured. User:Luli Logo (Talk January 8, 2023 14:20 (UTC)

Really easy to find; sorry for your request, but make sure if you find a logo that almost nobody cannot find, then it would be perfect. (Talk/Edits) 15:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Touchstone Home Video (1989).jpg
Reason: It's just that versions of famous logos with altered looks fascinate me. It looks really different compared to the movie logo (I know it's a home video logo, so it's not supposed to look exactly like the movie logo). Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 15:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose
Not rare or significant. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 23:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * , because it's not a really significant logo IMO.  Logohub   (talk) 15:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC)


 * It is pretty rare, since it only lasted a year before being replaced (it was around a bit longer here in the UK, though.) Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 13:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

File:TAT1979.png
Reason: A very rare logo thats very famous.

Support

 * 1)   Logohub   (talk) 17:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) CalvinWilkerson-transformed.png(The Third Place) 18:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) This was featured in the original Wikifoundry CLG back in the day, and considering other WF features were re-featured, I don't see why this can't. VPJHuk (talk) 19:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 4)  Solely because it's one of the rarest finds we've had. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 19:58, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 5) Since this was featured on the old Wikifoundry site, it's a no-brainer. Dominicmgm (talk) 11:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 6) Even though we got only one find that was 4 or 5 years ago, it is still pretty intresting. Rainbow charlie signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 02:56, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 7) It isn't already?! AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 8) Per everyone else. Eliternal Text signature.png (Talk/Edits) 15:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * , How are we supposed to know if it's good if it hasn't been found yet?  VinegarPop   (talk) 17:19, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * it's not about how good it looks, but rather how significant it is for the community.  Logohub   (talk) 17:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 1)  This is a screenshot from Broken Saw's video. If it wasn't from the 1980 rerun, I would support. Rainbow charlie signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 17:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

30th Television (2011).jpg
Reason: Before this find, all we knew of a 30th Television logo was a hella cheap version that nobody really liked. Those were found in syndicated prints. This new find by me is from a sales tape from 2011. VPJHuk (talk) 11:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) sig.png Talk ·&#32;Edits 11:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 2)   Logohub   (talk) 11:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) Compooper (talk) 11:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 4) Whenever we find something like this or a new logo is launched it should be immediately considered for featuring. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (name change coming soon) 11:43, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 5)  Rainbow charlie signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 13:52, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 6)  Tabit Signature.png (Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 14:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 7)   VinegarPop   (talk) 17:25, January 6, 2023 (UTC)
 * 8) T807sig.png · Talk · Edits 22:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 9) Supreme Raridade lol Thesquidgeeks (talk) 8:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 10) Eliternal Text signature.png (Talk/Edits) 15:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) All it is is just the normal 20th Television logo with a 3 instead of a 2. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 16:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * While the appeal isn't the most satisfying one, the real reason I posted it was due to it's rarity as well as it probably interesting a couple others. This is also a way better version of the 30th Television logo than the one we got in syndication. You can see that one here. Shame it wasn't used in the actual show. VPJHuk (talk) 16:50, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Lmao tell it to 30th Century Fox TV. This find is neat Rainbow charlie signature.gif(• USER TALK! •) 18:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * "Sonictailsknucklesshadow" Dios mio, you've unlocked them all! CalvinWilkerson-transformed.png(The Third Place) 01:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments
first nomination ever

Bell System (1941).png & others
Reasons:
 * The 1941 Bell System logo was found on Telephone History: "Long Distance", which in turn can be found here.
 * The 1983 Bell System logo was found on a March 1, 1983 airing of The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour. I actually expected the 2nd AT&T logo to be there, but I guess I got a surprise. This can be found here.
 * The rest was found on a Bell System/AT&T logo history video. They are all seen here.

Oppose

 * , In what situation would anyone vote for these?  VinegarPop   (talk) 17:27, January 6, 2023 (UTC)
 * Idk. Thought they were rare enough to be posted here. I don't blame you. Doctorine Dark (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Jerry Bruckheimer Films (Kangaroo Jack, Theatrical A).jpg and File:Jerry Bruckheimer Films (Kangaroo Jack, Theatrical B).jpg
Reason: This was actually found by someone on Twitter, but video has since been deleted and only these images exist.

Support

 * 1)  Doctorine Dark (talk) 11:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 2)  AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 3)  Agreed. Eliternal Text signature.png (Talk/Edits) 15:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments

 * 1) What rare about this? Thesquidgeeks (talk) 8:31, January 7, 2023 (UTC)