AVID:Requests for Permissions

=Active requests for adminship=

Oppose

 * While good in alerting others in files and articles suggested for review as well as sockpuppets, the reason why I oppose is due to your poor grammar, the fact you were only around for a month, your EXTENSIVE history of sockpuppetry on Logopedia, and overall not being a very constructive editor with your creation of stub pages and plagiarizing/duplicating other articles including this site and Logopedia. Camenati (talk) 22:51, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Support
Definite support here. Would love to work with SuperMax as an admin. It would also be good to have another Aussie admin around, especially when I'm not as available during my semesters and when other IRL stuff is happening. Talk ·&#32;Edits 08:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Per Hb1290. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 15:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Support
 Logohub   (talk) 06:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Talk ·&#32;Edits 05:03, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Well, he's an Admin on the Company Bumpers Wiki, so I think it's safe to say, he needs to here as well. Television Bois (Wanna chat?) 16:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments
User was promoted on Company Bumpers in the last couple of months. They're doing a good job so far dealing with sockpuppets and cleaning up their mess. They've also done some good work in the MediaWiki namespace with some of the interface messages to the point that I've ported some of his additions over here. Talk ·&#32;Edits 05:07, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

I won't support or oppose. And here's my reasoning. It has nothing to do with the user. Seems like a good guy. But right now, am planning a bit of an overhaul of CLG administrators. Just plan to cut out ones who aren't really cutting it anymore. So I will ask to hold off on any promotions until further notice, so we can get everything straightened out. That's all I have to say MatthewLMayfield (talk) 13:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Are there any updates regarding this administrator overhaul? While I still have some ways to go to meet the criteria, I do want to look into becoming an administrator, mainly to help with the sockpuppet problem on the wiki. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 01:00, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Oppose
You need to have been editing for a full year in order to request adminship; you have only been editing for six months. --CooleyBoy10 (talk) 00:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Comments
I would suggest you read the "Note to Requesters" part of this page first. Given the circumstances, I don't suppose you qualify for this position even in the slightest yet. --PM pinter (talk) 19:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I have read the note to Requesters. Poocian (talk) 20:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Support
TVB

Comments
Any other detail you need besides that? TVB (talk) 20:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Also, remember to put a signature by using the characters " ~ " LMgamer36 (talk) 08:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

I have edited for a least one year, had more than 100 edits, and communicates in a near-native fluency of English. LMgamer36 (talk) 01:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Oh, i meant 1000 LMgamer36 (talk) 03:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Come on, where is everybody? LMgamer36 (2020, 2022-present).webp (Visit my talk page!) 08:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Support
-Definitely. They're always on top of sockpuppets and alerts us on Discord. We could use one more good person to keep up shop. AnimeTVLogos (talk) 03:31, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Definitely a strong candidate for admin. HC has been instrumental in alerting myself and the other admins to a number of vandals and sockpuppets. They've also been in involved in alerting the stewards to LTA accounts in need of Global Locking. I'd be more than happy to work with them as an admin. sig.png Talk ·&#32;Edits 23:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I have to agree TVB (talk) 23:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I want to become an administrator, because I am the good editor? Qamichelemir59 (talk) 15:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * No. Well you're already blocked. LMgamer36 (2020, 2022-present).webp (Visit my talk page!) 02:31, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Comments
=Request for Revocation=

User:MatthewLMayfield

 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
 * While this revocation seems to be successful so far despite being open for a few hours, the user in requestion has resigned rendering this revocation moot. Agent Isai (talk) 03:59, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

talk · contribs · editcount · [ logs] · [ block log] · [ rights log]
 * Using his admin tools to demote multiple admins with no appropriate reasoning, suppressing the community-driven process of admin election by deleting this page, "discontinuing" the discord with no discussion or warning. Oh, and off-wiki transphobia as shown in these chats with the BOD and ENunn from a while back Note: "Lee" in these images is him. Plus he arbitrarily removed the pronoun roles in the discord which is why we kicked him off there some time ago. FYI, this was created on the advice of a steward. sig.png Talk ·&#32;Edits 01:49, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Support

 * Evaluating my reason later. I will let others post their reasons before mine. Camenati (talk) 02:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I get your reasoning, but overthrowing the community rule and placing a forced dictatorship is probably the definition of "wrong". Not to mention the evidence provided that you're heavily transphobic, which seemed to have started ever since HibicusCrown20 was promoted to admin. Thisisanswer (talk) 02:08, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The way Matthew's acted is not acceptable, especially the ominous threats of "changes" in the forum. This is a wiki, and if the community doesn't approve of what's happening, the wiki will not last long. Daemonspudguy (talk) 02:12, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Where this is going could very much wind up in a community autocracy. This is way too much power consolidation, and is, in this instance, nothing short than a power grab. Let's not even MENTION the fact that this admin's a known transphobe, going behind our backs on the (now unaffiliated Discord server) and removing the pronoun roles entirely. If that isn't transphobic enough, there's also proof that he also harbors transphobic views and is willing to share them whenever possible. He is pretty problematic from what I saw, veeeery vile and downright toxic behavior. TheAmigo67 (talk)
 * Even stronger than strongerest support - we've got to do it to save this community. Solarstrike (talk) 02:27, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, aside from this type of racism, for deleting the adminship requests, so nobody can request it for hard work, I think he shouldn't be an admin.--Crazy Muzzarino (talk) 02:31, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I’ve had a bad feeling about Matthew for the longest time after witnessing all the forced rule changes made with virtually zero communication with the wiki’s community outside of private discussions with the Board of Directors and practically forcing any users critical of said changes to remain silent, learning of his transphobic behavior on the Discord a while back and the whole debacle with a user being unfairly blocked by him over what’s believed to be an editing mistake on his part, but today has thoroughly cemented that Matthew should not be allowed to continue his reign. Not only did he abruptly pull user rights privileges from me, TheUsername21 and ENunn out of the blue and on incredibly thin grounds, but he attempted to censor any criticism directed at this change and his actions and even went so far as to delete the Requests for Adminship page (aka this very page) and try to protect it from recreation, and that’s not even going into how he went against Steward Agent Isai’s action of recreating the page by deleting it again and even demoted hb1290 for recreating it despite it going against a Steward action. I’ve been working on and dreaming of helping to make this wiki a much better and more welcoming place for everyone, and all Matthew’s actions have done is hinder that vision and instead create an environment that feels unwelcoming and hostile to other editors, which arguably goes against Miraheze’s Code of Conduct. With all that considered, I am completely for his rights to be officially revoked. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 02:40, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * He's one of the first admins on the wiki if I'm correct, but he's just abusing his power.
 * I don't think transphobes should be running a wiki that has people from many diverse backgrounds. Additionally, changing wiki direction without notifying users only inspires a lack in confidence, which has developed thanks to the abuse of power. I support not only revocation of Matthew, but other bureaucrats and admins who agreed with his actions. User:Dreamcast99 (talk) 02:58, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Good lord, I don't know if I can look at Matthew the same way again after seeing those images. Absolutely disgusting. I know he's resigned but I wanna say I support this 100%. There is no place for transphobia *anywhere*, much less a logo wiki. FryLetterman (talk) 03:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Comments
Okay. How about this. You admins? Come meet me in my office. How about that? PackMasterFlash (talk) 03:34, 10 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.