AVID:Requests for Comment/New rules for Availability section and other changes

Should we ban such phrases like "Seen on films/shows by this company from this time" and similar phrases from the Availability section?

And also should rename Trivia to Facts, Music/Sounds to just Sounds, Music/Sounds Trivia to Sounds Facts, and Logos to Description? Sickminecraft45 (talk) 16:16, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) the availability part CalvinWilkerson-transformed.png(The Third Place) 16:32, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) the availability part. Also, can we ban the use of "Don't expect this to appear on" comments? IAmThe789Guy (talk) 17:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC) IAmThe789Guy

Oppose

 * 1) the renaming part CalvinWilkerson-transformed.png(The Third Place) 16:33, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) Why should we rename our sections? They're perfectly fine as the way it is right now.   Logohub   (talk) 17:06, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 3) in the world for the renaming,  for the Availability part because it already has been implemented. Compooper (talk) 17:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 4) for the renaming part; it'd be change for the sake of change instead of change for the sake of being beneficial.  for the renaming part as per Compooper. T807sig.png · Talk · Edits 17:14, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 5) for both. Banning common phrases are rather dumb and hard to avoid for newcomers. Like the tip provided on the tutorial guide, it is not acceptable unless examples are provided, so for people who dislike this phrase, it is partially outlawed. As for the renaming part, no reason is provided why. This feels more like band wagoning the FX/SFX renaming than a reasonable proposal. As for the request itself, as I stated before, these sections are fine and concise as they are. "Facts" literally encompasses everything in the description, "Sounds" will feel off without music being prominently mentioned in the section, and "Description", similar to my reasoning with "Facts", sounds more like the "Logo", "Technique", and "Music/Sounds" sections combined. Also, if a DescriptionIncomplete template is added, then some editors may confuse that with the "Description" section itself rather than others in the article. Camenati (talk) 17:22, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 6)  for the Availability part. I haven't really saw a problem with this.  for the renaming part. Like Scoob, can we not try to rename every single section. There was a early request similar to this. Charlie fiddlesticks signature.png (• USER TALK! •) 17:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 7) The renaming feels completely unnecessary to me, as right now I don't think there's any need to rename those descriptions, at least at the time of typing. It just feels like trying to change things for the sake of things. As for the Availability part, we already discourage using those kinds of phrases in the Tutorial Guide, and I've recently made a new template (AvailabilityExamples) to tag their usage. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments

 * 1) "Seen on films/shows by this company from this time" is already not allowed. Here's an excerpt from the tutorial guide: "Be specific! Don't just say "found on the company's releases at the time", name at least some of the releases the logo is known to be on." AVID:Tutorial Guide   Logohub   (talk) 17:08, 14 December 2022 (UTC)