AVID:Requests for Comment/Create a "needs grammar help" template akin to NeedsImages

Create a "needs grammar help" template akin to NeedsImages
Throughout my time on the wiki, I have marked many pages for logos that have really messy grammar, but, as someone unfamiliar with the logos being described, I don't feel comfortable working on, with the Cleanup template as a way to say "hey, can someone more familiar with these logos than me help clean up the grammar?" For instance, just before coming here, I added "Cleanup" to Sinking Ship Entertainment for still being a bit messy with the logos I haven't seen (I cleaned up what I could). This, however, does not give the reason as to what the issue is (for instance, Cleanup is a vague enough word that it could also mean a formatting mess, yet a lot of these pages including Sinking Ship are formatted fine), so many of those pages remain untouched. I think we'd be better if we had a grammar template specifically to mark those pages that really need help. Like NeedsImages, Cleanup, ane DescriptionsIncomplete, while it isn't the solution, it would allow the pages to get the attention needed faster. Adding the template should probably add the page to a category for even easier access. As a whole I think think "this pages needs cleanup" is a vague enough statement that I'd rather the Cleanup template be split into different issues, but I don't know where I would start on the full scale of this, so in the meantime, I propose this baby step. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 04:45, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) if it doesn’t exist already, I think adding a reason box to the cleanup template (similar to what we have for the delete template) would work better. Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (Lets chat!) 04:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) A reason box would also fix the issue. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 05:12, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The template already has a "reason" parameter, which is already used for situations that the proposed template would cover. sig.png (Talk ·&#32;Edits) 13:29, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) per EMG. T807sig.png · Talk · Edits 08:32, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 2) Per above. Gilby1385 (talk) 13:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments

 * 1) Since the issue has been worked out in an early comment I would suggest this be closed as invalid, because the requested functionality is already there. --Raidarr (talk) 16:02, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Seconded. Gilby1385 (talk) 16:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I give permission to close, I didn't know. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)