AVID:Requests for Comment/Revise criteria for SNOW closure

Revise criteria for SNOW closure
I've noticed lately that many proposals are being shot down rather quickly due to the snowball clause. I feel like more and more proposals are being closed with under 10 votes and within a single day. So, I'm proposing the following criteria: Increase the vote count to trigger a SNOW closure to 10 or more unopposed votes, and have the grace period before that happens be two to three days.

What do you think? Compooper (talk) 13:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Support
in the condition that the minimum be lowered to at least 10 or something. I've got a feeling that not many people vote as much at times. The grace period is just as fine though. Two days is enough. Either way, I'm in. Doctorine Dark (talk) 13:06, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


 * under these conditions Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png (Lets chat!) 13:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Could do, I guess. Gilby1385 (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Sounds like a good idea! (Talk to Me!) 19:28, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Luke2505 (talk) 20:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

· Talk · Edits 21:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Oppose
If we had a bad idea, How would we quickly erase it from existence? Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 13:06, 6 February 2023
 * What do you mean? Doctorine Dark (talk) 13:09, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Maybe, someone has a stupid idea. Then, they unknowingly make an RfC for it. It gets a ton of opposes. Then, how will they close it? Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 13:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Easy. Someone requests a speedy closure/SNOW if needed, and if the above conditions are met, have an admin or bureaucrat close the RfC. Doctorine Dark (talk) 13:16, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * But it happened within the course of one day. And they're so embarrassed, they try to take it down instantly. Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 16:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)